Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Hello, Bagoto, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, Its Causes and Consequences, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women its Causes and Consequences. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

  1. a link to the article you copied from
  2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 15:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Non-governmental organization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third sector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conservative corporatism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Profiteering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Late Registration, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Diskurso listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diskurso. Since you had some involvement with the Diskurso redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Saddhiyama (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit
 
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Bagoto,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cilla (BBC TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norman Vaughan and Jack Warner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Andanar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audioblog. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
 

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Bagoto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from https://wildedecadence.wordpress.com/2014/03/03/the-differences-between-symbolism-and-decadence, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Bagoto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I See You (The xx album)

edit

Hi. Please don't restore Baeble Music and Earbuddy. Check out both their sites. Baeble Music calls itself a blog in its own header. We don't accept blogs as sources on Wikipedia because they're self-published (see WP:SPS). Same with Earbuddy. It is run off Wordpress. Anybody can set up a Wordpress and buy a .com domain. It doesn't make them an authority or a notable source in music. Thanks. Ss112 11:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oplan Double Barrel listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oplan Double Barrel. Since you had some involvement with the Oplan Double Barrel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for prompting me on this, Mr. Guye. Already placed my comment at the discussion page you linked to for my perusal. Thanks again. Bagoto (talk) 01:55, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Bagoto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Noli Principe Manalang) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Noli Principe Manalang.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Noli Principe Manalang.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Gaslighting America (Amanda Carpenter book) X300.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Gaslighting America (Amanda Carpenter book) X300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, @B-bot. The image is now used. Bagoto (talk) 11:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
 

The file File:Gaslighting America (Amanda Carpenter book) X300.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Amanda Carpenter#Career in media and politics which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free book cover art generally can be uploaded and used when done for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of stand-alone articles about books themselves per item 1 of WP:NFCI, but other types or non-free uses or uses in other articles is pretty much not allowed for the reasons explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3. This file was originally uploaded and used in Gaslighting America, but that article was deleted. The file was then moved to Amanda Carpenter, most likely under the assumption that this wouldn't be an issue. The non-free use rationale was never updated to reflect this new use, so the file also currently fails WP:NFCC#10c. There's no real way to resolve the NFCC#10c issue that would also satisfy NFCC#8 unless some sourced critical commentary can be found about this particular book's cover (not the book, but the cover art itself) and that can be added to the Carpenter article. Without doing this, simply adding a non-free use rationale for the use in the Carpenter article wouldn't be valid per WP:JUSTONE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Athena Home Loans

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Athena Home Loans, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 11:38, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jojo Soria de Veyra

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jojo Soria de Veyra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicente-Ignacio Soria de Veyra. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jojo Soria de Veyra for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jojo Soria de Veyra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jojo Soria de Veyra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Citigroup into Citibank. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bob Vylan Presents the Price of Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Album of the Year. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Franco Pepe

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Franco Pepe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 10:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 09:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noli Principe Manalang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Album of the Year is included at WP:ALBUMAVOID

edit

Hello. Regarding this edit, please avoid citing the website Album of the Year as it is listed at WP:ALBUMAVOID. Also, WP:CITELEAD applies: the album received acclaim from critics because of its inclusion on year-end lists and its rating from Pitchfork, which are listed in the critical reception section, so there's no need for the citation anyway. In case you were sourcing anything else, its release date is really not a contentious detail—at the very least, we shouldn't use Album of the Year, which is a WP:USERG source, to cite it. Thanks. Ss112 20:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

VNL category

edit

Please don't rename the category of VNL related articles as a bot will do it in the upcoming days. See also WP:REDNO. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 09:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Noted, 98Tigerius, sorry about that. Bagoto (talk) 09:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Correct the roster of Argentina Men's VNL 2024

edit

Can you please correct and look up the reference of Men's Rosters of VNL 2024 for Argentina? 108.21.67.83 (talk) 03:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done. Bagoto (talk) 06:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Correct the Rosters of Bulgaria Men's VNL 2024

edit

Can you please correct and look up the reference of Men's rosters of VNL 2024 for Bulgaria? 108.21.67.83 (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done. Bagoto (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Can you please correct and look up the references of Women's Rosters of VNL 2024? 108.21.67.83 (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Was able to do corrections/updates up to the Japan women's team roster. Bagoto (talk) 09:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Was able to correct all remaining teams' roster today. Please check. Bagoto (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Can you please correct and look up the references of Men's rosters of VNL 2024? Including Brazil. 108.21.67.83 (talk) 14:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done. Bagoto (talk) 08:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Philippine architectural features

edit

Hello, thanks for creating the Capiz shell window article. I have placed the article in Category:Philippine architectural features. The category currently contains only a few articles. I am not familiar with Philippine architecture and I have seen you are active in editing topics related to it; maybe you can help populate the category? Thanks. Sanglahi86 (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, Sanglahi86. And thanks for creating the Category where the "Capiz shell window" article specifically belongs. All right, I'll do my best. I'm actually looking forward to creating articles on the "banggera" and the "batalan" next. Thanks for your trust. Bagoto (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Bagoto. Thank you for your work on Capiz shell window. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This was a really interesting article! You should definitely submit it to WP:DYK if you haven't already.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Moriwen (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Moriwen: Thanks for your comment re the article. I would be happy to see the subject mentioned in the DYK section. However, it does seem that, since it was created on 9 August, it does not anymore pass the WP:DYK#New rule. Bagoto (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ventanilla lead image

edit

Hi. I have seen this image of a ventanilla in Commons. Though it is closed, the ventanilla is centered on the photo and is the main focus of the image. Do you think it is a better lead image than the current one? Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think it's a better image. Then again, might it be best to merge the two photos? Bagoto (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Or do a cropped version of the first photo before merging it with this second one? Bagoto (talk) 23:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Now that I think about it, by itself, the closed ventanilla image may be mistaken as merely being part of the wall. So yes, it might be better to use both images in the lead for those unfamiliar with the architectural feature. Maybe we can use {{Photo montage}}? Sanglahi86 (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, let's see. In the meantime, I applied your suggested image, with the necessary caption to address your concern. Bagoto (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks. I also created a Commons category for the feature so that it can be populated. Regards. Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good idea! Thanks, @Sanglahi86. Bagoto (talk) 08:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply