Babybubler90

Welcome!

Hello, Babybubler90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

was "vs" is

Hi there. I've noticed your edits to Catherine Tate related pages, but I've had to revert some of your edits. The show and characters still exist, so therefore it should remain "is". Check out Albus Dumbledore for a character, and for example The Vicar of Dibley etc for a tv show. Eagle Owl (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Babybubler90 (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your constant changing of the tenses in the Lauren Cooper article. Have you not referred to the Dumbledore article for an example of what tense is appropriate? Eagle Owl (talk) 10:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Wispa

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --ImmortalGoddezz 20:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Babybubler90 (talk) 20:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello again...

I see that you are back again. I have just tagged you, rather than reporting you directly, as I think there is some evidence that you are making an effort to better support the general Wiki community this time. HOWEVER, you still need to add edit summaries to all of your edits, and you ought to use the preview function, rather than just saving each and every minor change as you make it. These two items will reduce the time that other editors have to spend checking your edits. I will be keeping an eye on you and if you do not start to cooperate and put into practice some of the good advice that you have been given, I will have no choice but to assume that you are being deliberately unconstructive. Pyrope 21:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Babybubler90 (talk) 21:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Babybubler90 (talk) 10:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Why are you randomly adding your signature without making any comments? ^anemone│_projectors 13:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry User:AnemoneProjectors I just thought it was the right thing to do sorry about that Babybubler90 (talk) 15:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I guess you were acknowledging that you had read the previous comment, so I suppose it's better than just doing nothing. ^anemone│_projectors 16:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks yeah you are right Babybubler90 (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I just spent some more time going through and reverting many unexplained and incorrect edits made by this new persona of WJH1992 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), and haven't done them all. I don't see how the lesson was learned here - I think something more is called for. Look at Babybubler90 (talk · contribs · count) contributions. Perhaps not straight-up vandalism, but definitely not getting it, and frankly, wasting editors' time going through and then fixing errors and mis-edits, after warnings and after acknowledging the above comments. Tvoz |talk 21:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Some edits are correct, most are not. Unfortunately, blocking doesn't work either. ^anemone│_projectors 21:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

flags and edits

I've also reverted a bunch of your recent edits. See WP:FLAG for why I removed flags that you added to some pages - they aren't to be used for birthplace as it can be confusing regarding nationality, and for other reasons. Also, The Gibb pages have been carefully constructed regarding their origins as it has been contentious with some claiming them as Manx, English, or Australian. So, we avoid the issue through consensus reached on Bee Gees to say where they were born, lived, moved to, and reached success. Otherwise - please use edit summaries and look at talk pages for discussions. Thank you. Tvoz |talk 17:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Again: please use edit summaries -

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Solway Harvester. Nor have you done so on your other edits and you have been asked repeatedly. Editors need to know why and what you've changed. Tvoz |talk 21:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Babybubler90 (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Norman Wisdom

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Norman Wisdom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ^anemone│_projectors 10:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry mate I was trying to put correct Babybubler90 (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

But you've made the same edit several times, and you've given no reason why you removed his spouse and children from the infobox. ^anemone│_projectors 21:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Lauren Cooper. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. _TalkIslander 17:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lauren Cooper. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. _TalkIslander 18:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Babybubler90 (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:MOS or something, your edits are terrible and take a lot of time to clean up. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah sorry Babybubler90 (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lauren Cooper, you will be blocked from editing. _TalkIslander 13:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Indef blocked

Obvious and not really improved sockpuppet of User:WJH1992, who was indef blocked for exactly the same type of edits. Let's not waste any more of our time on this, please, but indef block as soon as it is fairly obvious who we have here. Fram (talk) 10:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Proposed deletion of Deals on Wheels

The article Deals on Wheels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Deals on Wheels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deals on Wheels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deals on Wheels (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 02:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)