Babelcolour5

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Doctor Who (series 6), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►consulate─╢ 12:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Equal Three Episodes

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on List of Equal Three Episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. JohnHWiki (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at List of Equals Three Episodes

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from List of Equals Three Episodes, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Woops!! sorry I wasn't meant to do that, sorry (Putting the Colour in Babel 08:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC))

File source problem with File:Matt Robert Smith.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Matt Robert Smith.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Matt Jacob Smith.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Matt Jacob Smith.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011 ctd

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of Doctor Who serials, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Specifically, this edit made a bit of a mess, which other editors had to sort out. Also, generally, and especially when removing references, it's a good idea to put a brief explanation in the edit summary. Cheers. Maccy69 (talk) 12:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:=3 title card.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:=3 title card.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Wow, good job!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Wonderful job on the List of Equals Three Episodes article. That took serious time and dedication, and for that, you deserve this barnstar! :) The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Wow! Thanks (Babelcolour5 (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC))

June 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Last of the Time Lords, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ╟─TreasuryTag►Odelsting─╢ 12:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

What did I do? Babelcolour5 (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

You deleted a wad of valid and useful information with no explanation? ╟─TreasuryTag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 12:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I was just trying to delete some of the plot as it was way to detailed just as the tag said, I must've deleted some important information by accident, sorry for dude I'll try not to do that again (Babelcolour5 (talk) 13:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC))

Hello Babelcolour5. IMO your edit is a legitimate paring down of a bloated plot section. In fact you seem to have done a good job of removing info that was much too detailed. The edit was most certainly not vandalism. The problem is that you are not using edit summaries to let other editors know what it is that you are doing. Please see Help:Edit summary if you need more info on how to properly fill in the edit summary field. Thanks for your efforts and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 13:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Un-necessary plot details

Please will you stop removing "un-necessary plot details" in such a way that makes it impossible for people to understand the article? For example, here you deleted the explanation of why the alternate Doctor considered his balloon to be a TARDIS. Here you deleted the explanation of what the Vashta Nerada were – how could anybody reading the article guess that? Here you deleted the whole, "Something old something new," business, which was an important part of the plot and explained how the Doctor was able to return into the rebooted universe. And here you deleted the information about Amy's wedding dress, which has a vital importance to later episodes.

Have you actually watched the episodes in question? Because if you have, I don't see how it is that you can be unaware of how important these pieces of information are. ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 08:28, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

• Please read the last sentence of this article as you left it and tell me whether or not you think it makes any sense at all? ╟─TreasuryTag►draftsman─╢ 09:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

  Opps sorry (Babelcolour5 (talk) 10:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

  Aboard the TARDIS, the Doctor explains to Amy and Rory that unanswered questions remain about the destruction of the TARDIS and the nature of "the silence" that will fall, They than set out for there next adventure. That is no better at all. If you are unable to make these edits properly then you need to just stop. ╟─TreasuryTag►constabulary─╢ 10:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

One one hand I applaud that you try to improve Wikipedia, but on the other hand what you did to Boom Town (Doctor Who) was just too sloppy. Two commas got treated as if they were periods, Blaine is spelled SBlaine, and there's a sentence with 520 characters / 89 words! Minor problems maybe, but fixing one problem and introducing new ones is just irritating for other contributors, and my response was to revert your edits. RenniePet (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:NewUncyclopedialogo.png

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:NewUncyclopedialogo.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:NewUncyclopedialogo.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:NewUncyclopedialogo.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:NewUncyclopedialogo.png and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:NewUncyclopedialogo.png with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:NewUncyclopedialogo.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Warning

If you continue to upload images with no explanation of how they are compliant with our policy on copyrighted content then you are likely to be blocked from editing. ╟─TreasuryTag►Lord Speaker─╢ 09:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ╟─TreasuryTag►assemblyman─╢ 16:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Arr... what are you talking about? What speedy deletion notices? (Babelcolour5 (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm obviously referring to the speedy-deletion notices which you removed here and here – why you appear to be feigning ignorance on this topic is beyond me. ╟─TreasuryTag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 07:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Ray Willaim Johnson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ray Willaim Johnson.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 06:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:=3 title card.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:=3 title card.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Equals Three Episodes

The article List of Equals Three Episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable web series

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 01:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. stop cursing in the edit summaries JDDJS (talk) 01:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Equals Three Episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Equals Three Episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Equals Three Episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Dam, That got fucked, didn't it, I thought that article was actually not gonna get deleted, But no people just had to fuck it didn't they. Babelcolour5 (talk) 09:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Giving myself a Cheeseburger because I'm hungry Babelcolour5 (talk) 00:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

About Doctor Who series articles

Per the Doctor Who WikiProject Manual of Style, which reflects practice in reliable sources, each year of episodes for the 1963–89 series should be referred to as "seasons". And as The Trial of a Time Lord was released as the banner title for the entire twenty-third season, it should be at that title (compare: it's Torchwood: Miracle Day, not Torchwood (series 4).) Sceptre ^(talk) 11:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

 Done Thanks, for telling me that Babelcolour5 (talk) 11:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Season 16 DVD cvr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Season 16 DVD cvr.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Who Season infobox help

What problems are you having with the infobox? I'm just checking in before work right now, but might be able to look at it more afterwards Etron81 (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't matter now, I found out what was wrong with it, and I fixed it. But thanks anyway. (Babelcolour5 (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC))

Great! If you have any further issues/questions, please feel free to ask! Etron81 (talk) 15:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Rcsprinter123. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Russell T Davies with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rcsprinter (talk) 11:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Who (Series 6) Colour Changes

Please refrain from repeatedly altering the colours on this page. The colour currently used coincides with the other Doctor Who pages and another orange colour too similar to the colour you keep replacing it with has already been used on the page for series four. Thank you, Alexbrabyn (talk) 12:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Umm... I'm pretty sure I only did it once. I find the orange color more fitting for series 6 unlike the purple, can I simply change the color of series 4? Babelcolour5 (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Doctor Who (season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Whitaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Doctor Who (season 6), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ice Warriors, Michael Ferguson and Michael Hart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Who season articles

I reverted your reversion of my change at Doctor_Who_(season_10), and I'd just like to explain the reason for the change and similar ones I've made/am making on other season articles. The Title attribute on Template:Episode list automatically formats the episode title in quotation marks, like you would for an episode of the post-2005 series or indeed most other TV shows, or for a single part of the classic one as these are indeed single discrete episodes of a larger whole. Doctor Who serials from the classic run are formatted instead with italics, as per WP:ITALICS and Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who/Manual of style. The general rule of thumb being that if you can organise it on your shelf separately, it takes italics. In order to do that you need to use RTitle in order to just output the raw title, then format it with italics. Hope this helps. - Chrism would like to hear from you 14:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Ray William Johnson. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 14:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

The Ellen DeGeneres Show

Please do not reintroduce information as you did in this edit without providing a proper source. Sottolacqua (talk) 03:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Ellen DeGeneres Show. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not reintroduce unsourced information. Your edit history within this article is moving close to violating WP:3RR. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Summeries for Doctor Who

I am trying to find out a bit about old series of Doctor Who but don't have much information. I have been monitoring recent articles (but done no editing) on Doctor Who season's 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and so far I can not find anything to add for the summeries for each episode. Do you no any other Wikipedian who likes doctor who that much or could you even help? Thanks.Steveojavano 23:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveojavano (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Doctor Who (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Color added on Doctor Who on Google

I sometimes use Wikipedia on my mobile or cellphone. I changed the look on the Doctor Who seasons articles because although the colors do work on Internet Explorer, for some reason they do not show on my cellphone or on Google Chrome. I tried to change make the white text on color background, but had no success whatsoever. Every time I look at Doctor Who (season 1) for example I could not read white letters on a nearly white background and it was pissing me off. If you go on to your cellphone, then view history, then press "Compare selected revisions" and you'll see what I mean. But please do not attempt to change it again. I will appreciate it if you don't. It now actually now looks alright. Really. Steveojavano 11:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveojavano (talk • contribs)

Problem solved

I have managed to figure out how to bring up the white text on the background colors and it does work on all type of internet including Google Chrome annd mobile view. Just put in three F's in instead of six - for example like this:

! style="background:#AD5402E; color:#fff;"| Story No.
...and so on. I managed to do doctor who seasons 1 and 2, but have not done the rest yet. Feel free to do the rest if you wish. Have fun.Steveojavano 23:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveojavano (talk • contribs)

Sorry, the above style works fine on IE, but is unreadable on firefox (white text on very light grey). I've reverted Season 5, but haven't touched the others for yet--perhaps you can find a solution? Thanks Metebelis (talk) 03:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Etron81 has fixed it, so it's all good. Metebelis (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Awesome... Babelcolour5 (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I think I owe you an apology

When I told you that I fixed the problem when I made a slight tweak so that the colors worked on Google Chrome and mobile phone view on season's 1 and 2. I eventually started doing the rest of the articles. It worked! Great! But when I went click on "View history" at the top of the page, so that it would say for example "Revision history of Doctor Who (season 1)" then I cliked on where it said "Compare seleted revisions" where it said "latest revision" I had the words |rollbackAPG|rollback|VANDAL|, (that's vandal in Capital letters which freaked me out, then I thought "hang on a miniute, why am I being call a vandal? cause I did everything right. But I did not want get into trouble for this or having the risk of being blocked, so I reverted it all back again and then buried my head in the clouds. I think its better to say that I will not be doing any more editing for a while until this is all blown over. You deserve an apology, so I am very sorry. I hope you forgive me. I am so glad that Etron81 has fixed the problem so that it even now works on Firefox too. Briliant! You are more than welcome to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.Steveojavano79.66.209.224 (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Doctor Who (season 4) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gerry Davis and David Whitaker

Doctor Who (season 1) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Frank Cox

Doctor Who (season 17) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Hayes

Doctor Who (season 2) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Whitaker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

LineColor issue

You were asking for help on the 'Line colour' bit on your edit to the Immortality (CSI) page. Since that edit has been reverted it's not necessary for that page, but for the future when you write: !style="background:#5F021F;"|Title there is a #. But when you write: |LineColor=5F021F there is no #. You put a # in the LineColor code and that was why it didn't work. 99.155.193.234 (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that! Hopefully it will prove helpful in the future. Babelcolour5 (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samuel Witwer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Days Gone Bye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Doctor Who (season 1)

added a link pointing to William Russell

Doctor Who (season 2)

added a link pointing to William Russell

Doctor Who (season 3)

added a link pointing to Jackie Lane

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Doctor Who

Thank you for your edits on the Doctor Who season pages. However, do note that WP:TVCAST states that [t]he cast listing should not contain an episode count, e.g. (# episodes), to indicate the number of episodes in which the actor/character appeared. And I've retitled the sections as "Main cast" rather than "Main characters", as the list is given as "CAST as CHARACTER". Alex|The|Whovian^? 10:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for that, I made all those edits pretty much at the same time so I wasn't quite aware that episode counts weren't supposed to be included, Sorry about that. Babelcolour5 (talk) 11:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

No problems at all, just informing you. It's actually a somewhat-recent addition to the guideline. Surprised no-one's got around to adding a cast section before. Alex|The|Whovian^? 11:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Haha, I was quite surprised myself with that as well. Also, Just a thought for consideration, for later seasons that include recurring characters, should I add them into the section as well under a new sub heading; "recurring cast"? Or not bother? Babelcolour5 (talk) 11:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I see no reason as to why not. Alex|The|Whovian^?

Okay, awesome! thanks! Babelcolour5 (talk) 05:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Charmed credits list

Two years ago was decided that Holly would be first because she is the longest cast member and the only one who was in every ep including unaired pilot, followed by Alyssa, Rose and Shannen. We made consensus, so stop changing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Visekruna (talk • contribs) 09:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

I came here to mention this as well. Your current edits appear to constitute part of a slow-rolling edit war that goes against consensus. The (finalized) discussion and consensus concerning the cast list ordering is here. I'm inclined to agree with its conclusion, but, if you think the cast should be ordered by first appearance, you need to start a new section on the article's talk page, explain you reasoning, and wait for consensus supporting a change before acting. Thank you. —  Rebbing  talk  20:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

List of Full House and Fuller House characters

Concerning your edit about Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen in season 1 [1], you might be right about them not being credited in the opening sequence. The YouTube video mentioned in the summary did not have them listed, though it was an extended version of the theme song and probably ran only for the very first episode. I'm thinking they stayed unlisted for the entire first season, however, and I might vaguely recall them being credited at the end of those episodes as Mary Kate and Ashley Fuller Olsen. Outside the YouTube video, the season 1 DVD set may be the best place for verification (which I don't have), as opposed to using the presentation of the opening sequences in syndication, like on Nick at Nite. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

NICSICSC listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NICSICSC. Since you had some involvement with the NICSICSC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AussieLegend (✉) 11:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Babelcolour5/NCIS (season 14)

Hello. I would suggest that you nominate it for speedy deletion. You may do so by adding the template {{Db-g7}} (minus the tl|) at the top of the article, signifying that you request its deletion. I also recommend blanking the page, after ensuring the season article isn't missing info on yours. I would speedy request it, but will give you the honors. Let me know if you need further assistance. — Wyliepedia 08:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Babelcolour5. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of NCIS cast members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Conley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Babelcolour5. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Production codes

The numbers used by Futon Critic don't determine airing sequence, so the fact that 341 is not currently listed doesn't necessarily mean it will air before any of the listed episodes and you can't assume that it will. That would be original research, which is not permitted. We have to go by what is verifiable now. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, I understand now Babelcolour5 (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Tables

Re this edit, tables should not be greater than the width of the page, i.e. 100%. All of the columns must add up to the total width specified. Each season column should be a consistent width, i.e. all 5%, not some 5% and others 5.5%. With 15 seasons, each 5%, 15 x 5 = 75%. Therefore the remaining column is 25%. 75 + 25 = 100. All columns need to have their widths specified. Setting the width of some columns results in columns of different widths to that specified so if you only set some column width you may as well set none at all. Setting the width of the characters column to 5% is pointless because columns can only shrink so far. If the text in the column requires 10% width and you set the width to 5% this has no effect as the column will force a 10% width regardless of what you've set. This is a big problem with the existing table. None of the column width are really having any effect because of the way that the table is set up, hence the reason I said "this table needs to be rewritten". The table should be formatted like the original table at List of NCIS cast members#Overview. And please stop calling tables "sexy". As I've said, they're not sexy, they're supposed to be encyclopaedic. It's rather a silly thing to say. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Ahh! understandable, I didn't realize it contained so much mathematics haha :) but fair enough, as for the sexy thing, I just use that ironically, I know it's silly. I'll try and stop that Babelcolour5 (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCIS characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit Summary

When adding something of that size like you did on "Whose Line It It Anyways," please leave an edit summary. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 20:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Whose Line Is It Anyway? (U.S. season 13) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jeff Davis

Whose Line Is It Anyway? (U.S. season 8) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jeff Davis

Whose Line Is It Anyway? (U.S. season 9) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jeff Davis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:WhoseLineUS.jpg

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Whose Line Is It Anyway? (U.S. season 9), may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Babelcolour5. While Wikipedia generally allows non-free screenshots of TV programs to be uploaded and used for primary identification purposes, this pretty much only considered acceptable when the screenshot is used in the main article about the series like is done with this file in Whose Line Is It Anyway? (U.S. TV series). For articles about individual seasons of a series, however, the non-free use of the primary logo is almost never considered acceptable, except when the logo is specific to a particular season such as an anniversary logo, etc. Generally, in such cases, a logo specific to the individual season is preferred over simply reusing the main logo over and over again. If no such logo exists, then it might be possible to use DVD/BR cover art for the individual season (if the season was released as such) for primary identification purposes, but the defaut is once again not to use the main logo if no individual season logo exists. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Babelcolour5. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DW S3.13 Last of the Time Lords.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DW S3.13 Last of the Time Lords.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DW S3.5 Evolution.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DW S3.5 Evolution.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)