Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!



AvatarMN/2009

edit

Hi AvatarMN, happy new year! Just letting you know that I moved your page, AvatarMN/2009, to your userspace at User:AvatarMN/2009. If you'd still like it deleted from there, please add {{db-userreq}}. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note, User:JohnCD has since deleted the page from User:AvatarMN/2009 (unlikely he knew that it had been moved). If you'd like it restored let me know, otherwise, happy editing! Sorry for all the confusion. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. And I'd have deleted User:AvatarMN/2009 myself if John didn't beat me to it. I meant it to be User_talk:AvatarMN/2009. I only do this once a year, so forget how to! Thanks again. -- AvatarMN (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
No problem at all, happy 2010 - take care! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Stonewall & Riot: The Ultimate Orgasm

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stonewall & Riot: The Ultimate Orgasm. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonewall & Riot: The Ultimate Orgasm. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply