Thank you

edit
  The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 009482d437c5e38f16d61d0476826974

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Nondeterministic finite automaton with ε-moves

edit

The article you created appears to contain extensive sections cut-and-pasted from non-free material found on websites, and this would be a violation of Wikipedia's policy against copyright violations. Please see the talk page of the article. The article must be deleted unless the copyright violations can be removed, or unless you can show that you are the owner of the webcontent, or that it was somehow copied from your article. Please see WP:COPYVIO. Wikipedia articles may not contain uncredited copying of the work of others, Please do not create such articles, or add nonfree material to existing articles. Thank you. Edison (talk) 16:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please reply on the talk page of the article. It makes things easier to follow than scattered threads on user pages. No, you may not copy a 100 word section without crediting the book or website where you found it, under Wikipedia's policies. Edison (talk) 16:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the explanation that the text was cut from another article in Wikipedia and used as the basis of your new article, That is fine. All that was needed additionally was, per WP:Splitting, to note in the edit history of each article that the split was done, and to add a template to the talk page of each article. I have gone ahead and taken care of these processes. Clearly the various websites borrowed from Wikipedia. Because you deleted the text from the old article, it did not show up in Google searches. No need to change it or paraphrase it. Thanks for you work to improve the coverage of this important area. Edison (talk) 18:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Nondeterministic finite automaton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Binary and Unary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tree (automata theory)‎

edit

Hello,

First off, thanks for your numerous contributions in automata theory.

Second, could you share your original source for the linked article? There's some terminology I haven't seen before, like "direction".

Also note that the ranked and ordered properties were confused, which I have just fixed.

Cheers — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 14:37, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Automata construction

edit
 

The article Automata construction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and without improvement since 2011; as far as I know there is no "theory of automata construction"; a list of available constructions can be included in the general articles for each automaton type (finite/infinite, word/tree, ... automaton)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply