Arcaist

Ballylongford

That's a wonderful picture you loaded. Well done. Nelson50^T 18:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Siege of Carrigafoyle Castle

Cool picture.--Shtove (talk) 02:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

The Three Brothers (jewel)

Nice article - would you like to put it up for WP:DYK? I could do it if you like. Johnbod (talk) 03:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Absolutely, that would be wonderful - it's taken quite a while to assemble all this info, glad it can get some exposure. Thanks! -- Arcaist ^{contribs • talk} 07:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok, is it possible to get references for the last bits of those paras that don't have them - eg the end of the later history? Any ideas for the hook? Johnbod (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Good suggestion - those last sentences are also based on Humphrey 2014, which I've added. For the hook, maybe this: "DYK... that The Three Brothers jewel was once owned by the the richest man in history before it became part of the English crown jewels, only to be lost to history when Charles I of England tried to pawn it?" Too long? Too complicated? -- Arcaist ^{contribs • talk} 19:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

I think I figured out the nomination thing, should by on the DYK - it's my first nomination, so happy to hear any feedback! -- Arcaist ^{contribs • talk} 21:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Looks fine. Johnbod (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of The Three Brothers (jewel) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

The article is very nice, and great work on finding such a good image. I've got some feedback on the references, and also the hooks, which needs addressing before I can accept the nomination. Warofdreams talk 12:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Heists

Hiya I thought I'd let you know I've put the article up for a peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of heists in the United Kingdom/archive1. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

The fish were not biting at the peer review unfortunately. I have now put the article up as a featured list candidate at Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_heists_in_the_United_Kingdom/archive1. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Three Brothers

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Three Brothers jewel Basel.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Three Brothers (jewel)

On 2 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Three Brothers (jewel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Three Brothers was part of the English crown jewels for more than 90 years, but was lost to history after Charles I tried to pawn it? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Three Brothers (jewel)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Wonderful work, and incredible research, thank you so much. No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Really glad this interesting item will get a bit more exposure now. — Arcaist ^{(contr—talk)} 12:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Three Brothers (jewel)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Three Brothers (jewel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 06:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Three Brothers (jewel)

The article Three Brothers (jewel) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Three Brothers (jewel) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Three Brothers (jewel)

The article Three Brothers (jewel) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Three Brothers (jewel) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 05:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing Three Brothers (jewel). You have clearly put in a lot of time and effort. It is a fascinating topic, which now has an equally interesting English Wikipedia article! — The Most Comfortable Chair 08:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New College, Edinburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Black.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

New section about student accommodation

Hi Arcaist, I am wondering if you could help to write a new section about student accommodation under the part "Student life". I think this information would be useful for new students.

Yeah, good idea - could include Pollock Halls and some other locations. Could you create a new topic on the talk page there, maybe we can get some others to pitch in too? Thanks! — Arcaist ^{(contr—talk)} 19:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of Edinburgh

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University of Edinburgh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 08:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of Edinburgh

The article University of Edinburgh you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:University of Edinburgh for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of Edinburgh

The article University of Edinburgh you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:University of Edinburgh for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

University of Edinburgh

Well done on your continuing efforts to improve the University of Edinburgh article. Great to see it has reached GA status. Thank you and here's a barnstar (note./Shawn Tsao also rewarded) Coldupnorth (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

	The Scotland Barnstar of National Merit
	For your contributions to the University of Edinburgh article. Coldupnorth (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hi Arcaist,

This is to let you know that File:Three Brothers jewel Basel.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 24, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-24. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 03:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

That's wonderful news, thank you for selecting the picture. Looking forward to seeing it on the main page! — Arcaist ^{(contr—talk)} 09:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

The Three Brothers was a piece of jewellery created in the late 14th century that consisted of three rectangular red spinels arranged around a central diamond. It was known for having been owned by a number of important historical figures. After its commission by John the Fearless, Duke of Burgundy, the Three Brothers was part of the Burgundian crown jewels for almost 100 years before passing into the possession of the German banker Jakob Fugger. The jewel was eventually sold to King Edward VI and became part of the Crown Jewels of England from 1551 to 1643. It was worn prominently by Queen Elizabeth I and King James I. In the early 1640s, Henrietta Maria, the wife of King Charles I, attempted to sell the jewel to raise funds for the English Civil War, but it is unclear if she succeeded. Its whereabouts after 1645 remain unknown. This miniature painting of the Three Brothers, drawn at a scale of 1:1, was commissioned by the city of Basel to serve as an inventory but also as an advertisement to potential buyers around 1500.

Painting credit: unknown; photographed by Peter Portner

Recently featured:

• Constance Baker Motley
• Giacomo Puccini
• Midvinterblot

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edinburgh Futures Institute has been accepted

Edinburgh Futures Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 14:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)