Nomination of Something Positive for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Something Positive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Positive until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Firething listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Firething. Since you had some involvement with the Firething redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

J.R.R. Tolkien's listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect J.R.R. Tolkien's. Since you had some involvement with the J.R.R. Tolkien's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Wikipedia:Why Aren't These Pages Copyedited" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Why Aren't These Pages Copyedited. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Why Aren't These Pages Copyedited redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Sprawl

edit
 

The article The Sprawl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional location passes WP:GNG/NFICTION. Pure PLOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Sprawl for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sprawl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sprawl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Lond Daer Ened" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lond Daer Ened. Since you had some involvement with the Lond Daer Ened redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Enedhwaith" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Enedhwaith. Since you had some involvement with the Enedhwaith redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Old Púkel land" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Old Púkel land. Since you had some involvement with the Old Púkel land redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Finarfin family tree

edit

 Template:Finarfin family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fingolfin family tree

edit

 Template:Fingolfin family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Telerin for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telerin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telerin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Uncommon Latin letters has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Uncommon Latin letters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elendil family tree

edit

 Template:Elendil family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm (talk) 03:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:User page rounded

edit

 Template:User page rounded has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Usertalkpage

edit

 Template:Usertalkpage has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Userpage blue border short

edit

 Template:Userpage blue border short has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:User page mbox

edit

 Template:User page mbox has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Userpage otheruse

edit

 Template:Userpage otheruse has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:High Elves has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:High Elves has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sinfest for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sinfest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinfest (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply