Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Alisperic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.



Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perplexity AI (September 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Alisperic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Perplexity AI

edit

  Hello, Alisperic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Perplexity AI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Frankenstein

edit

Hi. I don’t think it was right for you to remove “erroneously” for Frankenstein’s monster’s page. Frankenstein is the name of the doctor, not the monster. Iacowriter (talk) 01:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

You may be mistaken; I re-added "but erroneously" in revision 1221184604 after User:Loschrod removed it. Loschrod removed it again in the revision right after. I agree with you; if you have a problem with it you could take it up with Loschrod. Alisperic (talk) 01:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
But the doctor is technically the monster's father, wich means the monster can perfectly be called Frankenstein as well. Loschrod (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think the main argument for removing "erroneously" is that nowhere in the book does it refer to the creature as "Frankenstein's monster" either, and the name "Frankenstein" has often been applied to the monster in secondary sources.
In any case, there has already been several discussions on the Frankenstein talk page about the topic (with the latest being this one) that you might want to look at. If you still want to discuss the wording of the sentence, you should open another discussion there (no need to discuss this on my talk page lol).
Personally, I now think that the best solution may be to not include "erroneously" in the sentence but include a note (Template:efn) explaining the complexities of the matter. I might be bold and make this change later. Alisperic (talk) 00:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Orders of magnitude (length), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply