User talk:Alai/Archive 19

Archive 1 - Archive 2 - Archive 3 - Archive 4 - Archive 5 - Archive 6 - Archive 7 - Archive 8 - Archive 9

Archive 10 - Archive 11 - Archive 12 - Archive 13 - Archive 14 - Archive 15 - Archive 16 - Archive 17 - Archive 18

Re: Category:United States business biography stubs split

Unfortunatly I started creating these before the comment was made and had not looked back at the proposal since. I will create the correctly named categories and move the templates (leaving a redirect unless a bot can change all the tags!) could you then delete the redundent categories. Waacstats 07:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Saxo Chr P front version 002.jpg

Hi Alai. Sorry to be a bother, but would you mind deleting this image? It is PD-art and I've replaced it with a better resolution version I've scanned myself and uploaded to Commons. Only, a bot doesn't seem to like the idea. Cheers. Valentinian ^{T / C} 21:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

That was quick, thanks. (Guess who accidentally got the projects mixed up and asked a Commons admin instead of an en: admin the first time?) Valentinian ^{T / C} 21:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey, not good with wiki, so I hope this is right, but I noticed your bot had made an edit on a page I have nominated for deletion... I wasn't sure if I did it right, so I thought I'd ask you to check on it. Cheers, JB (It's "Chris Erskine") —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jembot99 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirect from User:Shiva

Trouble is, that user's been active as recently as this July, not as you stated, 2003. You might want to check at WP:USURP as to whether you can change your user name to that, or indeed to "usurp" it as a secondary account. Per WP:USERNAME, you might also give some consideration to using a part-Latinised signature. Alai 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I hadn't checked that user's contrib log. I assumed it was unused because that user's last talk page edit was in 2003. I now have User:Śiva redirect to my user page and have it linked in my signature. Is this an acceptable solution? शिव 19:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 38	17 September 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Reader survey
Wikimedia treasurer expected to depart soon	WikiWorld comic: "Sarah Vowell"
News and notes: Template standardization, editing patterns, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Name

Hi, I was just wondering why you chose your username. Does it have anthing with the book, Ender's Game?--168.103.242.198 10:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

More Mallimakery

Further to your request that I inform you of incidents, here is yet another absolutely classic piece of Mallimak behaviour:

• [1]

I initiate a new article, and hey presto, one day later up pops Mallimak to vandalise it. When, I ask for the umpteenth time, are Admins going to effectively deal with this idiot? --Mais oui! 08:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Tibet

Please don't go on at me. I am working my way through them like Jaggang and Alamdo making sure they aren't "very detail free". This will take some time as noone else is bothering to help ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Now do you honestly think I like creating articles for the sake of it? No. I prefer to work my way and red of red links quickly and then add the details as soon as I can. Eventually every page will indeed have an info box and geo details. Nobody else bothered to put Tibet on the map. Why should a whole country be left off wikipedia? The problem is every expects the encyclopedia and new articles to be complete ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

As for stub sorting this is the least of the task I have ahead. I proposed new stub categories on films earlier as I work in many fields on wikipedia ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Eg. I've just done Baga, Tibet ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I didn't mean to appear hostile -apologies but I have amajor task to do and wish somebody would help out. If even one or two saw what I was doing and thought its a big task with potential - lets help him quickly add the infoboxes and info it would get done very quickly. I understand your concern for stub sorting and I believe you do a very good part for the project in doing so and preparing articles to develop into fuller ones, but in time I plan even to sort the categories by Prefecture/Region of Tibet. As the articles grow so will the navigation boxes connectign all places by region. I understand you want it done now sorted by region but I thinks its a bad idea to rush me just for the sake of stub sorting. If several people helped me it would be done like that and ready for stub sorting ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I guarantee nobody will be willing to even add one of two. IN a project of millions of people we should work together to build this right? All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I can see it if you work for the stub sorting project and see a 800 article stub category you think yikes!!! and when you can't see a way to try to break it up because the region isn't mentioned it might seem difficult. Often because of the contours of Tibet it is difficult to know which region or county the village is in anyway ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm talking about the least of my concerns compared to building the actual articles -of course its important for me to sort it but it can't be done over night. Completing all the villages along with my film work is top on my agenda but single handledy it gonna take a lot of time unless some people help me ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

OK I fully respect you. If we could come up with some way of sorting it temporarily it might help -I know you have the encyclopedia's best interests at hart in this area. It is a major task and I like many other people befor eknew absolutely nothing about the geography of Tibet and had only ever heard of Lhasa unlike the uk and the us where almost every hamlet is covered. I hope my intention is good to set out all of these articles with infobox and geo data and region/county when eventually there is no reason why most of them can't develop fully with some images. See articles like Nam Co - the country is beautiful yet most know nothing about it at all -it is my way precisely of trying to rmeove systematic bias and have a unique way of looking at the world. I would have preferred a bot to have done it!!! I am genuninely doing several a day but it is a mind numbing task which if a few people chipped in would be sorted asap. Eventually also some of the CHinese guys are going through and adding the transliterations and further details which are available on thes eplace sin China but not in the UK or the INternet ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Well put it this way. I could drop adding the full infobox at present. And can go through each article and just add the region it is in. This could be done pretty quickly perhaps a week or two. Then each page would be marked for you to split. I would prefer to go through and do each one fully but if you think this solves a major problem it can be done ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

If I did this it would mean having to cover 1600 articles rather than 800. I'd rather do each one fully now they are started rather than having to go back a third time. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 20:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

How about I recategorize the stubs as I go along. As I format each article I can change it to the relevant region-stub so gradually the main big category gets reduced and sorted? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The best way to do it for me is to adjust from tibet -geo-stub to nyinchi-geo-stub or nagqu-geo-stub etc as I go -stub sense will show this is valid as I go. I am going to create the new stub categories now. If you could mention this at the proposals page that they category has about 900 article in it they'll see. Thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I know you're supposed to propose stubv cateogries and wait three days but I have started 7 regional categories for the split and begun sorting as I develop the articles. See Arza etc ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

OK I've mentioned what I am doing at stub proposals having created the tmeplates and categories. I definately see the use in sorting this asap ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes perhaps but at the footer of each article the map is already there in the navigation boxes. It would be repeated twice. Tibet is such a beautiful country that it is a shame not to use an exnaple photo of a region ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok fella I'm off to sleep now buu tomorrow and the next few days I'll begin correcting stub cats as I go along -it will take some time to complete all but I'm sure you'll agree the framework is now in place to begin to organize it and to format each article concisely and efficiently. Hopefully eventually each page can be filled out with info and images making 800 fair;y good articles on Tibet. Perhaps I am too optimistic given the lack of info China often puts out on the web, but I know it will provide a good basis anyway (eventually!!!) adios y muchas gracias ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 22:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I would hope they will all look like Dhingri!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 10:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

I'll gradually work through it I've done Baimai, Gyari and Lingza for instance. These are good foundations I think but it may take weeks even months to complete it all. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Clarendon College Texas

I decided to just leave it as a "universities and colleges" category for now. This is a brand new article (written at my prompting) which needs work. I've asked my wife to take a look at it when she has a bit of time, since she is an excellent editor. I often know when something is wrong, but I'm not always sure what to do about it. The title for the College bothers me. One problem is that there is already another Clarendon College in Jamaica, so this new one needs to be different, somehow, and hopefully agreeable to the nice people at the college. Brian Pearson 04:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit on Clarendon College, Texas I've made the change to list of community colleges, as well. Brian Pearson 01:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Castile and León SFD discussion

I closed this discussion today; deleting the redirect and fixing the cat. However, I'm a little curious about the template. You said "I've moved it to {{CastileLeón-geo-stub}}", but that seems not to be the case. Does that still need to be done? ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 20:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

• Okay, looks good now. Thanks for the help! ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 21:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes...

I saw it was a difficult problem to resolve, but thought that you, being a more experienced wikipedian, perhaps could come up with some solution. Thanks for your concern. --Damifb 11:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 3, Issue 39	24 September 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Survey results
Wikimedia announces plans to move office to San Francisco	WikiWorld comic: "Ambigram"
News and notes: Times archives, conferences, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 01:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Alaibot

references: [1] [2] [3] [4]

I understand that it would be a lot of work (and possibly infeasible) to correctly identify previous vandalism. However, keep in mind it is not prudent to assume that other bots would catch the vandalism at all, much less before your bot tags the uncategorized page. A written message like the one I mentioned before would definitely be an worthwhile solution that's easy to implement (one line edit?). What would be great, I think, would be if the vandal bots could identify your bot's edits and check the previous history and revert both if need be! Of course that would require cooperation from the other bots and that's a bit easier said than done. In the long run I wish MediaWiki would implement some sort of tagging system that would keep track of edits by "known trusted" users selected by some criteria. Again, easier said than done, but it might help with some editorial headaches. Okay, I digress, but I wanted to share my opinion with someone. :) Take it easy! --Stux 23:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Simba Makoni

Hey there Alai,

I've been away from Wikipedia for a few months and am easing my way back into the routine. Could you take a look at Simba Makoni and see what happened? I can't figure out how to fix it. Also, do you know why Category:Zimbabwean people stubs is so depleted? Thanks!--Thomas.macmillan 15:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Is there any way to restore the previous article on Simba Makoni? He is a notable Zimbabwean politician and I'd rather not have to re-write the article from scratch. Thanks--Thomas.macmillan 16:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Scottish Conservative and Unionist MP stubs

See reply at User talk:BrownHairedGirl#.7B.7Bcl.7CScottish_Conservative_and_Unionist_MP_stubs.7D.7D. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Alai, thanks for your quick response. I have replied again, and changed the section header, so heres a new link: see User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Scottish_Conservative_and_Unionist_MP_stubs. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: tagging of IAAN

Thank you for responding. I figured that was the case. The page itself needed the help, not your bot. Anyway, it's not really a problem, I just wanted to point that out to you. And I understand what you mean about the WikiProjects wanting to tag "their" articles, but hopefully it will help topic-categorizing too. Thanks again. Rocket000 03:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 3, Issue 40	1 October 2007	About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"	News and notes: Commons uploaders, Wikimania 2008/2009, milestones
Wikimedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Automatically delivered by COBot 01:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome

It's been two years since your welcome. Substed template or no, it was appreciated! Have a good day. 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 03:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Category:2000s drama film stubs

I'll give it a go once I'm done with the music stubs. I think we could safely tuck thriller film under it, but not all romance films are dramas (witness Roxanne, for example). Cheers, Her Pegship (tis herself) 03:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

fix stub category

Hey there Alai, Could you fix Category:Nigerian sport biography stubs and move it to Category:Nigerian sportspeople stubs? Thanks for correcting my mistake.--Thomas.macmillan 18:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Russbot stub-sorting?

I'm a bit puzzled by edit your bot made a while ago. Was this a fully automated edit, or human-assisted? And in either event, why the template redlink? (Reply or notification on my talk page preferred and appreciated, thanks.) Alai 02:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

The edit summary reads "Robot-assisted fix links to disambiguation page Georgia." Robot-assisted means that I reviewed it manually before it was committed. And the stub tag was a typo, which I now have fixed (although you could have done that yourself). --Russ (talk) 09:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

You say I "could" have fixed it myself: well, I did, and re-sorted the stub -- which you then reverted for some reason. (Perhaps you didn't notice I linked to an old diff, rather to the article.) I'll restore my original fix'n'sort.

I should have been able to work out the answer to my initial question, I suppose, since it's not really an automatable task. But what I puzzled by is making "freeform" edits in the process of doing so, and introducing not-very-subtle-errors in the process, which don't look like they were "reviewed" in any very strong sense. If you're editing at script-assisted high speed, you're more likely to make and leave such errors, and if the account is flagged as a bot, leaves an edit summary that gives no indication of such changes, and indeed gives the strong impression of being one of an indentical "batch" of dab-related edits and no more, they're less likely to get picked up and fixed by others (I only noticed it, several months hence, when I noticed my own bot was repeatedly skipping it in a traverse of special:uncategorizedpages. Anyhoo, I don't want to make a big deal out of this (I've made worse errors from bot-flagged account and otherwise, I don't doubt), I'm just hoping this isn't part of a larger pattern. Alai 04:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

not exactly

   * Perhaps by "sortof copyrighted", you mean "made good faiths attempts to avoid naming confusion in the use of"?
      Alai 04:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

No, not exactly a comfortable attitude to receive either. I have no clue as to why the (now) renamed version is less confusing/more acceptable—it still contains "stub" despite your suggestion, which I could have lived with—and I still have strong doubts that WSS should be able to monopolize such an innocent and common word.

As to "Good Faith Efforts", was it also an effort exercising common courtesy and common sense, or was it overly officious and creating a hostile workplace? Your "GFE" can be exercised in other ways after all. They don't have to feed the ego (Hey look at what I uncovered--let me go brag it up--I can appear smart if I suggest this solution) and be obnoxious (perhaps you think being side tracked did me a favor, or enjoy being dragged through a public square naked is a good time?) in means.

More importantly, the 'name' matter could have been settled with a quick talk page exchange, not by invoking a process stealing time from the many over a triviality, and delaying use and implementation. Such tags are a tool, doing a job, and by whatever name, and being new and hardly used, a simple move with a db-author on the redirect template would have been far more efficient. But that takes something which is in far too short a supply around here—the initiative and common sense to exercise elementary courtesy of asking about a concern before making it into a fuss.

• All it takes is the simple friendly act of poking your head into a co-workers cubicle and asking this or such as do you know this name form is reserved 'HERE' and would you mind if we renamed it that instead. In short, people around here could cut half the discussion pages if they go to the party concerned and negotiate before taking things to the community. So yeah, the culture has a problem or four--and your cheeky self-justification boxed above exemplifies the attitude that makes this a hostile place at times.

• Worse, I'll probably never get a notorized copy of WSS's copyright on that word! <G> Have a good day! // FrankB 12:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Asteraceae stubs

The problem is that genetically speaking the Asteraceae did not divide nicely and evenly into a bunch of discrete well-sized groups. There are huge tribes and tiny tribes. The huge tribes are usually divided into subtribes. It's all, though, a function of the genetics, and the family is one of the more derived and successful families. The only good book on the topic, also usable by laymen, is out of print. Your only hope is to pick a tribe and find the latest scientific literature on the topic, or something within the past 25 years or so and use that. Post also on Wiki Project Plants and see if you can get some help, or ask User:Curtis Clark. I think your best bet is to pull out genera if the tribes or subtribes are too huge to manage, like making Senecio a category if needed. I'm not too swift on the stub categories, but I think simply sorting them when needed into smaller groups is a viable way of still grouping stubs in areas where people might come across a related group of species they can edit, especially with something as diverse as the Sunflower Family. KP Botany 08:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The big tribes are the Heliantheae, the Senecioneae, and Astereae. That's about the only thing everyone knows about the sunflower family, the 3 big tribes, so maybe that will give you a starter. KP Botany 08:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)