User talk:Afaber012/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
NSW Major League
Thanks for your contributions to NSW Major League. It's great to see someone else interested in baseball in Australia editing on Wikipedia.—Borgardetalk 15:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter
The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter | |
List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers, Nashville Sounds seasons, List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers, New York Yankees seasons
All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept. |
We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue. The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages! |
Unused football kit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Australian baseball task force
I saw your message at WP:AUSSPORT. While I have written a baseball featured article, cricket is my first sporting love and I don't think I would be much good writing about baseball people specifically. However, I have added a link to your request at WP:AWNB, which gets a little more traffic than AUSSPORT. One final note, are you aware of JRA WestyQld2 (talk · contribs)? Good luck! Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 22:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Who is this great JRA WestyQld2 you talk about? :p JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 01:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Auburn colours.svg missing description details
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)For your efforts
The Running Man Barnstar | ||
Afaber, over the past few weeks you have tirelessly contributed towards providing more and greater quality of information on baseball in Australia, particularly the national team. On top of this, you have single handedly made efforts and actions towards reviving the Australian baseball taskforce as to have others perhaps emulate the hard work you are doing. For this effort, I award you the Running Man Barnstar. Keep it up :D JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 13:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC) |
Southern Cross Pitch, July 2009
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 1 – July 2009 | |
|
This 1st edition doesn't have a whole lot in it, as you can see. At this stage its more of a call to action than anything else: anyone wanting to help out the task force is more than welcome to join in. Even if you don't feel you have something you can contribute, please spread the word to others who might. My intention is to try and put this out once a quarter or so at this stage - assuming anyone's interested in receiving it. If things pick up and there's plenty to put into the newsletter, then it might come out a little more often. The only people that received this who have not specifically requested it are people listed as members of the task force itself. To those people: I'll move you guys to an 'inactive' list if I don't hear back one way or the other, and you won't keep receiving the newsletter after this- I'm using this to poke those that are still active into coming by the task force pages every once in a while. |
Another C-Class Article
Just browsing through unrated articles and this looks like it meets criteria JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 12:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
New South Wales Major League
Doing all the teams is a big task, but will definitely continue to develop the project. I can try and help, but I don't have much first hand experience with the teams. Just make sure you link reliable sources otherwise you lose a lot of hard work. Found that out the hard way :( JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I won't be putting the pages up until I've got a decent amount of info with references in there. I'm going to be working on the articles in my sandbox. I've also got a page in my sandbox for anything I can find for the new ABL. I'm operating under the name "Australian Major League" just as a placeholder, just to keep it seperate from the old ABL. Afaber012 (talk) 07:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 00:55, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Baseball newsletter
Thanks for the offer, but my interest is in "importance assessment" of articles rather baseball. Regards. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 22:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
E Mail
I replied. Thanks for the reviews. There shouldn't be alot of problems, but if there are any, I will take care of them quickly.--WillC 04:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for passing the TNA World Tag Team Championship.--WillC 07:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Got Any Articles i should look at
im interested in helping so asking any baseball aticles that could use my help? see ya around BigPadresDUDE (talk) 01:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Without knowing about what knowledge you have, what you're interested in, that sort of thing, it's difficult for me to make good suggestions about specific articles. Here's a few ideas that should help point you in the right direction though.
- I'm guessing you've got interest and knowledge about baseball, so looking at WikiProject Baseball would be a first start. The Article Improvement Drive section talks about what the suggested area to work on for the project is at the moment. Every so often that focus will change, so it might be worthwhile going back to that once in a while. Just below that is the Tasks section: it's got suggestions for things that need work done and links to the articles themselves, as well as a bunch of task forces.
- The task forces are sort of like mini versions of WikiProject Baseball, that focus on specific areas within the project that might otherwise get left out, or where a number of people focus on so it lets them work things out for their task force without cluttering up the main project. If one of those task forces looks interesting for you, good idea to check them out - they usually have suggestions and ideas for things to work on. (If you've seen my user page, you'd see that I'm a part of the Australian baseball task force. We're pretty small, so we always welcome help. You'd be welcome to join, even if you don't have much info to put into the articles - we'd be happy to have someone who was willing to help with things like proof-reading articles, improving templates, and other tasks that aren't as "glamourous" but just as important.)
- The WikiProject Baseball talk page usually has a bunch of things being discussed, sometimes with requests for help. If someone there is working on an article you're interested in, talk to them about ways you can help out.
- A lot of what I've said about WikiProject Baseball applies to the other projects as well. Not all of them have the same type of structure, but they have the same basic idea of looking at articles in a specific topic area and trying to improve or maintain the existing ones, and creating new ones when and where needed. If you take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject, that will show you all the different projects out there. (Some are part of bigger projects, like Baseball is a part of Sport.)
- Ultimatly it's up to you how and where you contribute. I hope this has helped you to come up with a few ideas and find something to work on. Afaber012 (talk) 04:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
ah cool gonna look at WikiProject Baseball everyday and help everyday as much as i can and oh yeah i joined Australian baseball task force. and im gonna help as much as i can mate (as you aussies would say) see ya around wikipedia BigPadresDUDE (talk) 04:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
ABL Info
I don't know if you've seen this yet, but it may help you with the article. ABL FAQs JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 10:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Invintation
im giving you a invintation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/San Diego Padres What do ya say? BigPadresDUDE (talk) 23:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 14:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
GAN notice
Hi Afaber012, you currently have at least one article up a WP:GAN in the Sports and recreation section. In an attempt to clear out the backlog there, User:Wizardman asked all sports WikiProjects to review at least two articles from that section. I'm now going around and asking anybody with an article nominated under Sports and recreation to review at least one article in that section to help us clear the backlog out so your articles can finally be reviewed faster! iMatthew talk at 15:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Australia national baseball team
The Baseball Barnstar | ||
I award Afaber the Baseball Barnstar for tiresome effort on not just large chunks of content in the Australia national baseball team article, but working on the nitty gritty stuff to make this the first primarily Australian baseball to reach good article status. There hasn't been many days where I haven't seen your username on my watchlist. Thanks for all the hard work. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 03:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC) |
Southern Cross Pitch, September 2009
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 2 – September 2009 | |
The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since the last edition: |
Recently a new barnstar has been created for WikiProject Baseball, as a substitute for the {{Running Man Barnstar}}: {{The Baseball Barnstar}}. This has given me an idea for the newsletter. If any task force member gives a barnstar to someone for any work that relates to Australian baseball, or if any member receives a barnstar for any work they do, let me know on my talk page. I'll check with the user to make sure they're happy to be listed here (because I know some people don't necessarily like that sort of attention) and assuming I get the green-light I'll put it in the next edition of the newsletter.
|
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Baseball Radio National
Just wondering, do you listen/podcast the show? JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 09:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- I hadn't, but now that you've pointed it out I've subscribed to the podcast and been listening to the first couple from this season. I just listen to the 3rd one from about a fortnight ago, and had a chuckle to myself when they were talking about the World Masters Games. The guys mentioned how the Triple D's from south east Melbourne had a result turned over because they used a pitcher for more than 4 innings: that game was against my dad's team, while I was acting as assistant coach/bullpen catcher. It was great being out at BOP, where you can still see the remnants of the Sydney 2000 signs on the outfield walls. Afaber012 (talk) 10:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, our club won a competition for t-shirts on it last year, I got an email read out on the last show, they mustn't have much to do :-p They call the junior titles live which is good. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 12:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been exactly three years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Infobox
I like it! JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 05:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
ACT Bid
Keeping an eye on the goss for you as always: Read JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 05:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Southern Cross Pitch, December 2009
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 3 – December 2009 | |
The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since the last edition: |
I just want to take this opportunity to wish everyone a (belated) Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, that the holiday season so far has been good for you, and that what remains will be just as good, if not better. I'd also like to thank everyone who has been involved with the task force over the last year. I'd ask everyone to keep up the good work, and to invite anyone they can think of to join us: there's always room for more here.
|
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi, Can you provide a link to the usage of this flag and it's peers out Wiki? I've had a quick look and can't find it. This looks like a WP:OI to me Gnevin (talk) 09:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- They're not used anywhere else. I created them myself, as an extension of what had been done for Rugby League - specifically their use in NRL articles. There used to be a template for their use, but in just searching for it now I can't seem to find it. Their use - by me at least - has been restricted to tables and other similar cases as a shorthand for the team involved, while avoiding the use of logos and emblems which would almost certainly not be free- or fair-use, besides being difficult to identify at small scales. The only differences between the pre-existing rugby league icons and my baseball ones are the shape (their's are square whereas mine are rectangular to mimic the display of many/most national flags) and the fact that their's are solid polygons of colours, while mine are gradient colours with a baseball symbol in the foreground. Unless I'm missing something in WP:OI or its just to late at night here for me to understand it fully, I don't see how it applies as a concern. The closest way I can see that they "illustrate or introduce an unpublished idea or argument" is that the baseball shape in them might be misconstrued as a tennis ball or some other object. If that's a serious concern, then I can go through them and update them to remove the baseball logo, but I honestly don't think its an issue.
- By the way, I'm curious as to why you removed the Australian and New South Welsh flags from those templates. I mean, I don't think that they're critical to the templates, but at the same time I wasn't aware of them violating any Wikipedia policy, particularly seeing as they are the actual flags for Australia and New South Wales, not just something I've come up with. Afaber012 (talk) 11:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- The Australian and New South Welsh flags where removed as they where not critical and while not policy WP:MOSICON#Encyclopaedic_purpose says Icons should not be added only because they look good, because aesthetics are in the eye of the beholder: one reader's harmless decoration may be another reader's distraction. As for the icons they illustrate an unpublished idea i.e that these teams using these logos . By the NRL icons do you mean File:Saintscolours.svg type of usage, if so this is common usage in RL outside wiki or at least that is what I was told Gnevin (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Those are the icons I mean. But what exactly do you mean by "common usage outside wiki"? Because though the colours themselves are certainly used, I'm not aware of the specific designs being in use anywhere either online or offline. Perhaps its different as far as [{Super League]] is concerned.
- But my earlier point remains: we can't use the actual logos because of the copyright issues, but a graphic identifier in at least some if not all places I've used seems appropriate as a visual shorthand. A practice common not only to rugby league articles, but also to other sporting codes. To my way of thinking, if not a wiki-wide consensus then at least a consensus across several projects has already established that their use is appropriate. Afaber012 (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- I asked before and was told they where common in England, if they aren't they also should be removed . A similar situation is WP:RUIRLFLAG ,where con was formed to use an invention but policy was against there use . These icons need to go Gnevin (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- But policy itself is fluid. Many of the policies out there have exceptions, where not all of those exceptions are listed with the policy itself. I've just been involved with a discussion about the use of disambiguaters and whether their current use in baseball articles is consistent with policy. In that example, the basic policy says that a term such as "(baseball player)" or "baseball coach" should be used, rather than just "(baseball)". However it was successfully argued that just using (baseball) was fine, given the desire for brief disambiguaters, that it conveyed sufficient information in the majority of cases, and that a more detailed term would be used in cases where there was more than one person with the same name that would otherwise fall under the term (baseball).
- The colours themselves certainly do not represent an unpublished idea, and I honestly don't see how they could be construed to be doing so in the context in which they appear. Certainly no more so than their use in other areas that you've apparently already signed off on. The fans at games would have flags and banners incorporating the colours in a multitude of shapes, sizes, and designs. The designs I chose were an attempt to standardize them, and be representative of the teams' uniforms. Besides, the policy you're referring to seems to me to be open enough that it doesn't actually preclude the use of these icons, particularly given the various exemptions that are already in place for flags and such in sporting contexts in other parts of wiki policy. Afaber012 (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- MOSICON doesn't preclude the use of icons it and WP:OR says we can't invent stuff. I've not contesting the colours or the baseball icon . It is when these are all put together to form a flag that the whole becomes OR. The fans of London Wasps would wave flags but we don't have an icon for them. If you think you can get OI changed then I suggest you try to do so but I doubt you'll be successful. Gnevin (talk) 20:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- I asked before and was told they where common in England, if they aren't they also should be removed . A similar situation is WP:RUIRLFLAG ,where con was formed to use an invention but policy was against there use . These icons need to go Gnevin (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- The Australian and New South Welsh flags where removed as they where not critical and while not policy WP:MOSICON#Encyclopaedic_purpose says Icons should not be added only because they look good, because aesthetics are in the eye of the beholder: one reader's harmless decoration may be another reader's distraction. As for the icons they illustrate an unpublished idea i.e that these teams using these logos . By the NRL icons do you mean File:Saintscolours.svg type of usage, if so this is common usage in RL outside wiki or at least that is what I was told Gnevin (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
FYI Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research#An_OIGnevin (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Assuming they were displayed at approximately the same size as the existing images are at the moment (I'd need to see whether it was worthwhile at that sort of resolution), an approximation of the various teams' uniform tops to be an acceptable replacement? Obviously it would not be an issue as far as original research is concerned, because there are numerous sources to verify them. The only concern I can think of would be whether or not there was a copyright/free-use/fair-use issue with them. Afaber012 (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if they would pass WP:Copy but they wouldn't pass WP:MOSICON#Encyclopaedic_purpose Gnevin (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Given that WP:ICONDECORATION says that icons can be purely decorative, as long as they have a useful purpose in providing visual cues or layout, I don't see a problem on that side. The provision of visual cues is the whole point of the icons that are there at the moment. The template that the icons get displayed through can be easily modified to set the alt text and link to nothing so that they are then purely decorative. Afaber012 (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Then ask WP:COPY if you can create these icons. However I'd still contend WP:ICONDECORATION applies as there is not need to provide visual cues here but I wouldn't press the issue . Can I remove these icons from the templates?Gnevin (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've updated the template they come from so that it no longer displays anything. Unless I'm mistaken, that will mean the images no longer appear anywhere. That way I can keep the same logical structures in place so that if and when new images are ready to go, they can be dropped in simply, and not have to worry about replacing the template in all the articles. Afaber012 (talk) 08:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK that is far. It was nice to talk to you Gnevin (talk) 09:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've updated the template they come from so that it no longer displays anything. Unless I'm mistaken, that will mean the images no longer appear anywhere. That way I can keep the same logical structures in place so that if and when new images are ready to go, they can be dropped in simply, and not have to worry about replacing the template in all the articles. Afaber012 (talk) 08:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Then ask WP:COPY if you can create these icons. However I'd still contend WP:ICONDECORATION applies as there is not need to provide visual cues here but I wouldn't press the issue . Can I remove these icons from the templates?Gnevin (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Given that WP:ICONDECORATION says that icons can be purely decorative, as long as they have a useful purpose in providing visual cues or layout, I don't see a problem on that side. The provision of visual cues is the whole point of the icons that are there at the moment. The template that the icons get displayed through can be easily modified to set the alt text and link to nothing so that they are then purely decorative. Afaber012 (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if they would pass WP:Copy but they wouldn't pass WP:MOSICON#Encyclopaedic_purpose Gnevin (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)