December 2018
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Scott (talk) 01:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
@Scott Burley: The user falsely accused me of being a sock. He had no right to revert me like that. Your block isquite unfair. Also it is entirely uappropriate for you to me block me while a sockpuppet investigation is ongoing, I have a right to respond to accusations.80.111.40.28 (talk) 10:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
80.111.40.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for reverting edits. An editor had reverted a number of my edits citing WP:SOCK, the sockpuppet investigation closed and I was not banned as sock, therefore I thought it justified to revert the edits made under the false pretences that I was a sock. This was called edit warring and I was subsequently banned. I feel like this is harsh and not fair, especially considering I had only made one revert to the relevant pages.80.111.40.28 (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This doesn't explain how you'd resolve conflicts in the future, if we lifted your block. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
80.111.40.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for reverting edits. An editor had reverted a number of my edits citing WP:SOCK, the sockpuppet investigation closed and I was not banned as sock, therefore I thought it justified to revert the edits made under the false pretences that I was a sock. This was called edit warring and I was subsequently banned. I feel like this is harsh and not fair, especially considering I had only made one revert to the relevant pages. If I am unblocked I will solve content disputes through dialogue on the talk page.80.111.40.28 (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is the second edit-warring block (plus a vandalism block) within a very short time. Despite your claims above, the sockpuppetry investigation did not conclude that you weren't a sock but merely ended because you had already gotten yourself blocked for other reasons. I don't see that unblocking this IP address would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Y
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |