76.130.142.29

January 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to James Brooke—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your talk page posts

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Chris Gardner for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Your talk page posts are often unconstructive and have been removed by several users, including me. They also show a lack of situational awareness, such as at Talk:Emma Hauck and Talk:Elizabeth of Russia, where the answers to the questions you asked are readily available in the article, and at Talk:Maxwell D. Taylor, where you replied to a two-year-old comment. I noticed that in this edit a year ago, you used Wikipedia's new topic feature. Please do this for any future comments, as it makes sure they're signed and in chronological order, which is a problem that has needed to be fixed in your other posts. I must warn you that if you continue your current editing pattern, you may well be blocked, as it is disruptive. Graham87 (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

---