51.7.23.117

February 2020

Hello, I'm SSSB. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bahrain Grand Prix without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You finding something boring is not a reason for its removal. Nor is something being trivial. We are an enclopedia, mentioning the event's previous official names is enclopedic. If you disagree with that conclusion feel free to start a discussion on Talk:Bahrain Grand Prix.
SSSB (talk) 11:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

"Trivial" is indeed a reason to remove something. See WP:TRIVIA, WP:INDISCRIMINATE. And don't accuse me of not explaining things when I left the clear edit summaries that you have indeed responded to. 51.7.23.117 (talk) 11:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

It's not trivial. See WP:OFFICIAL.
SSSB (talk) 11:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

You post that link like it proves something. In each individual race's page, giving the official name in the info box makes sense. In the page about the event itself, an ungrammatical sentence of the kind that I removed does not. It is boring and trivial. It is an indiscriminate collection of information, that illuminates exactly nothing about the topic of the article. Do you actually perceive some value in it, or are you just being disruptive? 51.7.23.117 (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Firstly it being trivial and it being indiscriminate trivia are not the same thing. The only one being disruptive here is you. I quote from WP:OFFICIAL: Where an undisputed official name exists:

• It should always be provided...

There is no justifiable reason for its removal and it very clearly belongs in the article.
SSSB (talk) 11:54, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bahrain Grand Prix. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.
SSSB (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

C. Odumegwu Ojukwu

Hey there, am F5pillar. You just made an unproven edit on this article C. Odumegwu Ojukwu which if am not mistaken you did wrong edit there without typically explaining and prove it. Northern Nigeria Zungeru is in Niger State, so I put now (Niger state). You removed it without any source of other place or prove of what you do there Please if this is an IP Address User, consider login in or create an account to be partial. I will revert all edit you did in this article C. Odumegwu Ojukwu THANKS. (Say something (talk) 15:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

---