31.164.184.21

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slave rebellion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lewisguile (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Please read my edits before accusing me of vandalism 31.164.184.21 (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

You seem to undoing constructive edits. Please read before undoing. Thank you 31.164.184.21 (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

My reverts have nothing to do with your violation of the edit warring policy. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

You are leaving all final editions as per DonBeroni pro British version of history without references. I am trying to publish extended versions with ref's. 31.164.184.21 (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Ponyo. So I am blocked because I am trying to expose a non pro British view of history and showing ref's. And this DonBeroni a pro ultra British without giving any ref's version is the one that is kept in all edits. I am starting to understand how this works. You all work like a team to keep history as you want even knowing that you are hiding facts. Very cooperative. Wikipedia should be a reliable source of information not a pro British version of history. 31.164.184.21 (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Where in my block message does it state that you are blocked because you are "trying to expose a non pro British view of history"? And I don't think you do understand how we all work; if you did you wouldn't be blocked under 2 IPs for continuous edit warring across multiple articles. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

No, you were blocked because you were edit warring. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

And DonBeroni, the one that started all of this is not blocked. 31.164.184.21 (talk) 07:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

You have used two accounts/IP addresses to make lots of non-constructive edits across multiple pages. This violates multiple rules. On the other IP account, you have numerous warnings for your edits, which you hadn't addressed (until recently). This hasn't helped your case.

The best thing to do would probably be to make an account, so you don't appear to be using sock accounts, and read up on WP policy in general. Some good places to start would be: WP:RS, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:SPA, WP:DUE, WP:BRD, and WP:TRUTH.

I hope this helps! Feel free to ask any questions you may have, and I'll try to help if I can. Lewisguile (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

To be clear, if an account were created it could only be used after the IP blocks expire.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I should have clarified that. Thanks, Ponyo. Lewisguile (talk) 09:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Well, they're back at it. Lewisguile (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery in colonial Spanish America, you may be blocked from editing. Please note the edit summaries for past reversions. Abolition in Bahrain and Nigeria are irrelevant for an article about colonial Spanish America. The text is very clear that this refers to abolition only within the Americas, not worldwide. It is therefore not misleading. Similarly, you keep removing text from the lede which you say is unsourced, but the material is sourced in the article body itself. The lede does not require sources per WP:LEDECITE. You have previously been banned for edit warring over similar topics. Lewisguile (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery in colonial Spanish America. — Moriwen (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Moriwen. Would you mind reading the reasons I gave for each of the edits I made? 31.164.184.21 (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Slavery in colonial Spanish America. Peaceray (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Incident report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lewisguile (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Great! I hope someone can read each of the arguments given for each of the edits I made before someone decided to undo my edits without even go through them 31.164.184.21 (talk) 21:43, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

The place to discuss your arguments is on the article talk page, not the edit summaries. Peaceray (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Same for the other users I guess 31.164.184.21 (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Furthermore you warned me to block me and blocked me straight away without editing after your warning. 31.164.184.21 (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

"while making personal attacks on another editor, and they have a pattern of making similar claims and removing or rewording material about Spain in relation to slavery" Personal attacks? You really need to lie in order to get me blocked? 31.164.184.21 (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

May I kindly know what personal attacks do you refer to? This to me seems to be a false statement in order to jeopardize my edits in front of the mediator Peaceray. 31.164.184.21 (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

You said "this DonBeroni a pro ultra British". That is a personal attack against DonBeroni. Lewisguile (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

I didn't know that British was a personal attack... 31.164.184.21 (talk) 08:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Slavery in colonial Spanish America.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Peaceray (talk) 21:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---