212.121.214.237

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emmeline Pankhurst. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Juana Inés de la Cruz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Juana Inés de la Cruz was changed by 212.121.214.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978005 on 2017-06-06T09:33:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maria Cunitz. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Maria Cunitz was changed by 212.121.214.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964847 on 2017-06-06T09:37:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maria Cunitz, you may be blocked from editing. TwoTwoHello (talk) 09:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of the periodic table. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Benin City. - Arjayay (talk) 13:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mary Anning has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mary Anning was changed by 212.121.214.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987592 on 2017-06-20T10:38:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to William McMaster Murdoch— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –72 _(talk) 13:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to William McMaster Murdoch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –72 _(talk) 13:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I'm Red-eyed demon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Free education without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Red-eyed demon _Speak 13:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judi Dench, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 09:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Steven Cheetham. Nihlus 09:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MarkSewath. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alessandro Volta without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MarkSewath (talk) 10:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alessandro Volta. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alessandro Volta was changed by 212.121.214.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955485 on 2017-10-13T10:21:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Dear Boss letter, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Manchester Coalfield. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 10:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Slavery in Britain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Slavery in Britain was changed by 212.121.214.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946594 on 2018-09-14T12:29:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. An edit you recently made to Blood type seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christmas in Sweden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Vianney, you may be blocked from editing. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 13:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Vianney. – Gilliam (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

---