July 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Imaginary unit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gabapentin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

August 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sexual dimorphism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dactyl (poetry) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Homestead Strike. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Plebs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Plebs was changed by 204.84.244.11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954985 on 2017-03-27T16:14:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Septrillion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Groundhog Day— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Septrillion (talk) 13:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Groundhog Day have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 13:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Groundhog Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 13:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Red Queen hypothesis, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Manuel Buenacasa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Monroe, North Carolina, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm William Avery. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Barton Springs salamander—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. William Avery (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. ElKevbo (talk) 23:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply