204.129.232.195

September 2021

Hello, I'm Ferien. I noticed that in this edit to Volkswagen Type 2, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ski, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ski, you may be blocked from editing. --Ferien (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2022 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:2020, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to San Pedro, Los Angeles. lol1VNIO^{[not Lol1VNIO]} (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 19:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm Wpscatter. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020s, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WPscatter ^t/_c 16:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Scorpions13256. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Southern California, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2020s, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WPscatter ^t/_c 23:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 07:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

@Deb Wow just wow. I didn't expect you to block me from editing Wikipedia. And I did some constructive editing on articles and talk pages.  I think I wasn't good enough to participate and enter in discussions. I guess I have to leave this site and take a hiatus until my block has expired. After my block has expired, I will start to edit in articles and create sections in talk pages. Further ado, thanks for helping me edit on Wikipedia and reply to me. I will move on this site and find somewhere else on the Internet. -- 204.129.232.195 (talk) 16:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

You've been blocked three times previously for disruptive editing. As soon as your previous block expired, you came back and since then you've had three warnings. What on earth did you expect? Deb (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

@Deb @NinjaRobotPirate  I expected on earth that I did make random comments on random Year talk pages, when I was trying to help the editors and contributors and you protected it for just so long months. I guess that I have been warned for unexpected and hidden three warnings and I lost my editing privileges.

"But here is my sample post from my unblock request. Note: My unblock request has been denied for that.

The most fair and main reason I should be unblocked is I was trying to help build an encyclopedia with constructive edits. There is no reason why you block me. I was making very good comments on Year talk pages with consensus established and many edits I made are harmless and not disruptive. Other IP users also helped that by making constructive comments on article talk pages. Examples of IP that made constructive and productive edits are, 2600:1010:B12A:AE74:30BE:A78E:1D4C:56E8, 2600:1010:B12A:AE74:F835:F68:51C5:4C62, 2601:205:C001:EA0:D2E:95F5:7A12:B8D7, 1.146.117.56, and other IPs etc. That also includes me also. They didn't vandalize Wikipedia, they are being helpful to other editors and creating meaningfulness on it. I even made very good edit requests like this page on 2022 and mine is accepted, other IP also did edit requests and never wasted editor's time. I think this is when I should be unblocked, I promise I can make meaningful contributions and my acceptance is that I will be here to build an encyclopedia these days. I also help with other registered users like those on the 2022 talk page. I beg you and admins to decrease protection on 2021 and 2022 talk pages because there are IPs that will help create reliability in this and make edit requests in order for them to be answered. I also noticed that those year articles lack constant editing and are protected for no reason at all. I also asked a good and polite question on teahouse also. One of those IPs also did an edit request and their request accepted too. I was trying to help with the collage image section, but someone warned me about the rules. This is the only mistake I made on this talk page. So, if you accept that, you can unblock me. So, thanks for understanding my message on my unblock request. I never did anything wrong. If not, I will leave the site to move on and focus on other stuff and sites on the Internet and other blogs and podcasts. But, I'm also innocent too just like any other IP user and ones I mentioned above. This is the message for my unblock request."

The reason why I request for my block appeal because:

• I will try to understand the reason why I'm blocked for disruptive editing
• I will promise and experiment that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, but help build an encyclopedia.
• I will make useful contributions instead of making those pages protected and finding other articles that need more fixing and improvement.

Also, since I was blocked yet again after my block has expired and I came back, I never knew that you are going to block me for that again, and there was no way for me to edit there again.

I'm not trying to hurt or disrupt you, I'm making a response of how to make good editing practices for me and other IPs. I also saw that many other IPs in the 2022 talk page make very good and constructive edit requests too. This includes me of course. I really wanted to join on in establishing a consensus on collage images.

 Not to mention that, a bunch of articles around Wikipedia are constantly changing based on their facts or new information. Since evolution is part of a website and wikis are included, I would like to appeal my block and give me advice, so after being unblocked, I will go back to editing articles with finding new information with sources, especially the Year and Decade pages along with 21st Century.

So, would you like to review my sample of my block and know that you are going to give me editing privileges again? I am also good at making citations on Wikipedia. I also ask constructive questions on Teahouse too. Many of these good editors responded with positive feedback and explanations that are helpful to me. I'm an experienced user, so it is better for me to give me another chance. This would be great if those pages you protected immediately, decrease protection, so other good IP editors will make good and helpful edit requests too.

Thank you for my message and reviewing me. This is me. Signing off. -- 204.129.232.195 (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

204.129.232.195 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The most fair and main reason I should be unblocked is I was trying to help build an encyclopedia with constructive edits. There is no reason why you block me. I was making very good comments on Year talk pages with consensus established and many edits I made are harmless and not disruptive. Other IP users also helped that by making constructive comments on article talk pages. Examples of IP that made constructive and productive edits are, 2600:1010:B12A:AE74:30BE:A78E:1D4C:56E8, 2600:1010:B12A:AE74:F835:F68:51C5:4C62, 2601:205:C001:EA0:D2E:95F5:7A12:B8D7, 1.146.117.56, and other IPs etc. That also includes me also. They didn't vandalize Wikipedia, they are being helpful to other editors and creating meaningfulness on it. I even made very good edit requests like this page on 2022 and mine is accepted, other IP also did edit requests and never wasted editor's time. I think this is when I should be unblocked, I promise I can make meaningful contributions and my acceptance is that I will be here to build an encyclopedia these days. I also help with other registered users like those on the 2022 talk page. I beg you and admins to decrease protection on 2021 and 2022 talk pages because there are IPs that will help create reliability in this and make edit requests in order for them to be answered. I also noticed that those year articles lack constant editing and are protected for no reason at all. I also asked a good and polite question on teahouse also. One of those IPs also did an edit request and their request accepted too. I was trying to help with the collage image section, but someone warned me about the rules. This is the only mistake I made on this talk page. So, if you accept that, you can unblock me. So, thanks for understanding my message on my unblock request. I never did anything wrong. If not, I will leave the site to move on and focus on other stuff and sites on the Internet and other blogs and podcasts. But, I'm also innocent too just like any other IP user and ones I mentioned above. This is the message for my unblock request. 204.129.232.195 (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

On further reflection

This editor's English is so bizarre that I have a feeling he/she does not actually speak English to any level of competence but uses an autotranslate function to turn his/her comments into English. This would explain why so many of the comments s/he's been making on Talk pages (and most of the other IPs listed are clearly connected with him/her) make very little sense. Deb (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

I dont know, if they spoke another language natively, why not just edit the articles in that language? I'm certain non-english wikipedia needs people who speak different languages. I do agree that it is absolutely bizarre. PaulRKil (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Deb I believe this user is ban-evading using @2601:205:C001:EA0:DD9D:F980:1B2C:6117 based on his edits in 2020s and the fact they write in an incredibly similar manner on other articles, particularly shopping malls and California suburbs. Those articles seem to be their signature. PaulRKil (talk) 20:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

PaulRKil I agree. It's fairly obvious and it's the same IP location. If there's any more disruptive editing, I'll be blocking that one too. Deb (talk) 09:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

@Deb @PaulRKil Can you explain why you think that my English is so bizarre? Also, blocking me for 6 months is unfair, you should do it at least about 3 days or 2 weeks? That will help. -- 204.129.232.195 (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

The reason we think your English is bizarre is that it is bizarre. We are English speakers and half the time we can barely understand what you are trying to say. Deb (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

As @Deb previously said, it is bizarre. As someone who didn't speak English as my first language, it seems either that you are learning it or are using a translate software to edit Wikipedia. As I've said, I guarantee there is more of a need for editors in your first language than there is a need for editors on English Wikipedia. PaulRKil (talk) 18:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

204.129.232.195 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As stated above: Read this  The reason why I request for my block appeal because: *I will try to understand the reason why I'm blocked for disruptive editing. *I will promise and experiment that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, but help build an encyclopedia. *I will make useful contributions instead of making those pages protected and finding other articles that need more fixing and improvement. Also, since I was blocked yet again after my block has expired and I came back, I never knew that you are going to block me for that again, and there was no way for me to edit there again. I'm not trying to hurt or disrupt you, I'm making a response of how to make good editing practices for me and other IPs. I also saw that many other IPs in the 2022 talk page make very good and constructive edit requests too. This includes me of course. I really wanted to join on in establishing a consensus on collage images.  Not to mention that, a bunch of articles around Wikipedia are constantly changing based on their facts or new information. Since evolution is part of a website and wikis are included, I would like to appeal my block and give me advice, so after being unblocked, I will go back to editing articles with finding new information with sources, especially the Year and Decade pages along with 21st Century. So, would you like to review my sample of my block and know that you are going to give me editing privileges again? I am also good at making citations on Wikipedia. I also ask constructive questions on Teahouse too. Many of these good editors responded with positive feedback and explanations that are helpful to me. I'm an experienced user, so it is better for me to give me another chance. This would be great if those pages you protected immediately, decrease protection, so other good IP editors will make good and helpful edit requests too. Thank you for my message and reviewing me. This is me. Signing off. Again, this is my second time of my block appeal. Let see how it goes. --204.129.232.195 (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC) 

Decline reason:

As stated above. I agree with the reading, such as it is, that your English seems to be translation-software output. If so, you cannot be considered competent enough to edit the English Wikipedia. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. 204.129.232.195 (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

---