Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Proposed deletion of Gustav Wyneken

edit
 

The article Gustav Wyneken has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking WP:RS to establish notability. Many of the sources are WP:FRINGE pro-pedophilia advocacy (David Thorstad, Edward Brongersma, etc.).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crossroads -talk- 23:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gustav Wyneken for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gustav Wyneken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustav Wyneken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crossroads -talk- 23:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply