180.150.115.177

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

09:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
PrimeBOT (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2020

Hello, I'm CyanoTex. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Barrier—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CyanoTex (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Runway. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 14:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit you recently made to Transport in Andorra seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of British billionaires by net worth. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.scraf
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of British billionaires by net worth was changed by 180.150.115.177 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86887 on 2020-10-23T13:27:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Transport in Andorra. - Arjayay (talk) 13:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

You are the vandal you retard! Stop removing facts.180.150.115.177 (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Terminator has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Terminator was changed by 180.150.115.177 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856212 on 2020-10-27T11:31:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Terminator has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Terminator was changed by 180.150.115.177 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912238 on 2020-10-29T12:30:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Pop. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Donner60 (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dum Dum, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 15:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 77 (number). Materialscientist (talk) 16:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I told you this is a flight! There's a freakin article. You must be blind!180.150.115.177 (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Coast guard—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Merry Christmas! Asartea ^{Talk Contribs!} 15:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Kemalcan. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kemalcan (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Scooter-sharing system; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 02:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John O'Gaunt School. jp×g 12:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That's not vandalism you ignorant little rat. Look at his article. 180.150.115.177 (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jump (transportation company), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

180.150.115.177 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Some one reported me to Vandalism noticeboard. This is false accusation; Wrongly calling me a vandal is not acceptable. I'd like the block to be lifted or shortened. I'd like this to be reviewed by another editor (not the one that reported me). This sort of block is unreasonable. Thanks. 180.150.115.177 (talk) 15:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, thank you. But I still think you should remind the other editor that accusing me of vandalism is unacceptable.180.150.115.177 (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

---