This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ɱ. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Honeynut squash you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
FYI:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Twinkle has a new update (more). It now supports partial blocks and includes the select2 library as a dependency. Select2 is available at MediaWiki:Gadget-select2.min.js for other gadgets and scripts to use.
Miscellaneous
Until now, this newsletter has been written primarily by me (DannyS712).
If others would like to contribute, help is always appreciated;
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 21:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Honeynut squash
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Ɱ
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username WikiAviator and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Dublin Link, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. This month, as part of Wikimedia NYC's commitment to the well-being of members, we will hold WikiWednesday online via Zoom videoconferencing! To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 04:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Dublin Link was not cancelled. Its opening ceremonies were. If articles affected by cancellations were included, every school article would be included. If the opening ceremony itself is notable, make an article for it to be included in the category, otherwise please don't add it to that category. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
The opening of the bridge is a crucial event to the bridge article, the bridge as a whole was delayed from the public. This isn't just like some school closure that would end up a minor part of its history. Categories do not have to be relevant to 100 percent of the article; they can be relevant to former uses as well as portions of articles. Even if the article title doesn't make full sense immediately, when you read the article, it makes sense. ɱ(talk)22:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
See WP:OWN. The opening of the bridge is not notable; an article about it would be deleted or merged. Now you have made that this bridge is cancelled. That's fake. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Ohio History Connection
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Bear with me, if you will, as I add a History section moving some of the previous contents that were in the lead paragraph to the body of the article. I'm going to revert your previous edits for now, but after another 20-30 minutes, if you disagree with the presentation, let's discuss in further detail on the article's talk page. I assure you, these will be much needed improvements to the article. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I already self-reverted. Thanks for putting in effort with this here; this is one of many Columbus topics I've been thinking of really working on, but would likely not be anytime soon. ɱ(talk)05:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
No worries! I was a bit slow after that last edit to make another one, as I was getting some sources together. Shouldn't be much longer. Thanks for the understanding! --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
OK, all done for now. I may revisit sometime in the next week or so to clean up some of the other sections. If you find time before I do, don't hesitate! --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Subway fire
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Automatically detecting Good Article, Featured Article, and Featured List status, and limiting ORES predictions to B-class
An updated version of Twinkle was released. Features relating to the recently-enabled partial blocks include automatic lookup of pages and expanded options for block templates. See a full list of changes here
For users of Enterprisey's easy-brfa script, the bug with transcluding new BRFAs has been resolved
For any scripts that previously made use of the edit API to change a page's content model, a new API module is available: use action=changecontentmodel to specify the new content model of an existing page. Documentation is available: mw:API:ChangeContentModel.
The dispute resolution noticeboard wizard is no longer a gadget, but rather is loaded using withJS and withCSS. See the discussion at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-DRN-wizard.js
Pending requests
A script to help file movers process requests, including
renaming the file
updating file links
removing the {{Rename media}} template (when relevant)
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Ɱ. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey! Thanks for adding maps/infoboxes to many of the Columbus parks articles I created around the time of the WikiConference. Only if you're curious, you can view my photos from this trip at commons:User:Another Believer/Columbus, Ohio. There are still some unidentified subjects and possibly images to add to articles like Alexander Park (Columbus, Ohio), but I'm less familiar with the exact boundaries of parks and where I was when I was stumbling around town taking pics. Anyways, just sharing in case this is helpful. Happy editing, and stay safe, ---Another Believer(Talk)17:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
No problem, it's been needing them! I'll take a look at your photos soon, but yeah, the boundaries between, say, North Bank Park to Alexander Park to Battelle Riverfront Park to the Scioto Mile Promenade and down to Bicentennial Park are extremely murky. IMO they should just name it all "Eastside/Downtown Riverfront Park" and call it a day... I still haven't found any map that clearly demarcates their boundaries, along with that of Genoa Park. Google Maps is no help either. ɱ(talk)18:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Ɱ. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Chicago
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. I have looked at the citations provided in the article - each of them. I don't see where any of the articles, including those presented that are archived, that provide his exact birth date. the Post Gazette article mentioned his age, which we can use to extract a circa born date. A quick Google search and I can only find unreliable sources that source back to Wikipedia. I like to adhere to our BLP policies, so I was just curious if you could tell me what citation states his exact birth date? It's very likely I missed it, it happens! With your help, I can add an appropriate inline citation where his exact birth is mentioned in the article. I appreciate it, as I'm just trying to be conscious, and sensitive, to WP:BLPPRIMARY etc. Thank you so much. Missvain (talk) 05:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi - this article does include Born Jan. 16, 1958, Tim Ryan grew up the only son and eldest of three children on what had been Rural Street..., among other seemingly well-researched and thorough points about Tim Ryan. ɱ(talk)05:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. This month, as part of Wikimedia NYC's commitment to the well-being of members, we will hold WikiWednesday online via Zoom videoconferencing! To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 23:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Enterprisey's reply-link has been updated to fail less, especially around template transclusions.
Twinkle released new features, including a new option to disable individual modules, support for stub template nomination at CfD, and integration with the PageTriage extension used to patrol new pages. (See full list of changes)
Open tasks
The mediawiki.notify resource loader module was deprecated and is no longer needed; its functionality is now available by default. See mw:ResourceLoader/Migration guide (users) for more. Any dependency on it should be removed.
Twinkle's Morebits library added a new Morebits.date class to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were using getUTCMonthName or getUTCMonthNameAbbrev with Date objects, those have been deprecated and should be updated.
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Please revert this edit. All post office worldwide are within the remit of the philately project. That project is not just confined to stamps but all other aspects of the postal service, its infrastructure, laws, buildings, etc. I've discussed this previously re US POs. Anyway what harm is there in another interested project template on the talk page? The British and Australian wikiprojects, amongst others, don't have any issue with this and understand the broader topic. ww2censor (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. All it would have taken for me is a simple edit summary. Thanks, ɱ(talk)15:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
I just thought I'd explain in some detail as I have had a slightly heated discussion about this topic previously. That's why I was perhaps too verbose. Thanks for your understanding. ww2censor (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Those Pittsburgh maps
Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. Thanks again for agreeing to that change. If you're curious (no action requested, just commenting), some of my response was just reacting against anything new, and if that IP address user hadn't started me looking I doubt I wouldn't have done anything. And your original maps really are very good in expanded form. But. What caught my eye was I didn't think they looked good in the small form that I see them in most of the time. The portrait-shape looks awkward for maps, and it clipped off the left and right edges of the city in the lower map. The top of the name "Pittsburgh" is clipped in both maps, and there's semi-visible text under the "Wikimedia" line at the bottom of the graphs, and with a map that small the plus and minus buttons cover up significant detail. After a while you probably ignore all that, but that's the first impression. Regards, Dan Bloch (talk) 04:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
@Danbloch: Alright, I appreciate that. As for the original formatting, sure, the city borders were a cut off a tiny bit, but it displayed better than when I tried it more zoomed out (unfortunately I can't do a zoom of like "9.5" or I would). The city name "Pittsburgh" did not appear clipped off as I've been viewing it, what are you using to view the page? As well, I don't see plus and minus buttons... And sure, the "Wikimedia/OpenStreetMap" bar will always block some neighborhood name or something, but it's not within the city boundaries, not something that's important here. ɱ(talk)04:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
It's all an unholy mess, depending on browser versions and other factors I can't figure out. I wasn't expecting this. The +/- buttons and truncated captions are an artifact of looking at this in a Wikipedia edit screen. The reason I was looking at it in a Wikipedia edit screen is that if I look at an old revision of Pittsburgh, one of the two maps is grayed out. Additionally, and this is the really weird thing, all along I was seeing the maps stacked instead of side by side, but I gather this wasn't your intention and it turns out this only happens in Chrome, not in Firefox, and also only happens in my Chrome profile, not in a guest profile. So a lot of my objections were about browser artifacts. At this point I just don't care any more. If you want to change it back feel free. Dan Bloch (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, and yeah. The edit windows display things differently, it's a known bug that hopefully will get fixed. Let me tinker with it more and see what you think. ɱ(talk)15:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Looks good in Firefox and in guest profile in Chrome. Maps are still stacked vertically in my profile in Chrome, but that's a Chrome problem. If I'm bored maybe I'll submit a bug to them. Thanks, Dan Bloch (talk) 16:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a Symposium on Wikipedia and COVID-19, which aims to answer questions the public may have about Wikipedia's coverage of the pandemic. The event includes four speakers, all of whom are active contributors to the topic area on Wikipedia, but bring different perspectives, backgrounds, and interests. The event is free and open to the public, broadcast live on YouTube and Facebook, and questions taken from viewers on these platforms. Abstracts and speaker bios are available on the event page.
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I'm thrilled to see that you're bringing your considerable talents to bear on Columbus Union Station. It's been on my to-do list for a while (I photographed the arch myself on one of my annual Saturday-in-fall trips to Columbus), but I doubt I'll have much to add after you're done. I haven't been able to find a free photo - or any photo, really - of the station building itself, but I did just find shots of a very out-of-place Turboliner at the platforms and the 1977-79 station. The story of the arch move is quite fantastic; there are some [non-free] photos here and here. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
@Pi.1415926535: Hi and thanks! I've been redoing all old/large rail terminal articles and more-recently every Columbus-related article, now that I'm living here. I'm not sure if I can get it as good as the others, plus it has relatively low pageviews, but I'll see what I can do. Thanks for the sources. Will continue tomorrow... ɱ(talk)06:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
I noticed you reverted my edits on this article, I don't see why you did as I backed my edits with reliable sources. Really, I see no reason for why you have any right to revert these edits. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
As you can see here, the National Portrait Gallery produces opposite paintings to that of the White House itself. It is not a "personal idea" and frankly I'm offended you referred to my edits as such when you reverted them. I wish you had come to discuss this with me ahead of time instead of doing this. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Hi, yes, I reverted some of your edits. I kept some, but your alteration of "On Monday February 12, 2018, the official presidential likenesses of Barack Obama" to "On February 12, 2018, unofficial portraits of Barack Obama" was not sourced, and ran contrary to the reference, The New York Times, a highly reputable source. As well, for the Trump portrait, Newsweek cited the work as the official portrait. Can you find sources that say otherwise? ɱ(talk)17:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
(edit conflict) In reply to your next comment, your source does not directly confirm or deny the official status of the Obama or Trump portraits. Frankly I'm offended you didn't take the time to read the article talk page; there's been discussion of it there, you should join the discussion before editing in your preferred version. I wish you had come to discuss this there ahead of time instead of doing this. ɱ(talk)17:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a more significant discussion to be had, on the article talk page. I don't think the New York Times is incorrect or adding fluff in calling the portraits official. ɱ(talk)17:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for the tip on upper/lower case on institutions. I was just attempting for consistency across the article and was unaware of the MOS section on that - so I learned something. I hope the returning of business to Ohio gets you back to work soon. We're struggling here as well. Cleveland Todd (talk) 16:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! Thank you for your edits to the Flag of Columbus, Ohio article. As you are a citizen of the city, I was wondering if it would be possible for you to take a better image of the flag flying outside the city hall for the article, as the image currently used isn't the greatest (partially obstructed by a tree, very busy). With COVID-19, now most likely is not the greatest time for this- I was just wondering if you could take one in the future.
Yeah I might already have one, let me look! Thanks for creating the article, most appreciated. ɱ(talk)03:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
@Jordano53: I took a clearer one quickly with my phone, though it doesn't have City Hall in the background. Hard to get a good angle, but I'm going to try again sometime soon with my real camera. In the meantime, is this photo any better? ɱ(talk)23:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I would say its a significant improvement, if you're able to get a better angle, please let me know, but I think I am going to implement this picture. Jordano53 (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Ohio Wikimedians User Group: May 2020 newsletter
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
General Updates
I hope this message finds you well and in good health during these trying times. Below is a list of some online activities that you may be interested in participating in.
The Wiki Global Check In has started! This initiative is gathering check-ins from Wikimedians all around the world, and asks for a photo that captures something related to life in your context or part of the world during the pandemic.
WALRUS (Wikimedians Active in Local Regions of the United States) is now hosting virtual meetings twice a month on Monday evenings. This is a place to discuss anything Wikimedia, as well as a place for Wikimedians to come together and mutually support each other. The next virtual meeting should be on Memorial Day, May 25th. You can sign up for the Wikimediaus-l mailing list to stay up to date on all WALRUS happenings and to receive meeting invites.
Wikipedians have been busy documenting the pandemic. In Ohio, we have articles on the pandemic in Ohio and in Columbus (the latter of which was written by our newest Ohio Wikimedians member, Ɱ!). If interested, you're encouraged to help update and expand these articles, or even consider creating articles documenting the pandemic in other Ohio metro areas.
If you miss visiting your local museums, don't forget that the Cleveland Museum of Art's entire collection is available online and in the public domain (when permissible). Our WikiProject Cleveland Museum of Art is currently tracking 44 English Wikipedia articles and 40,322 images, which are now acquiring over 2,000,000 views a month. If you're interested in contributing, there is still plenty of work to be done to expand and create new articles!
Movement Strategy
The finalized Movement Strategy Recommendations have been published! This is a clarified and refined version of the recommendations that were released in January.
The Wikimedia Summit 2020 that was to occur in April was canceled, and Wikimedia Deutschland will not be hosting a virtual replacement. In its stead, Ryan Merkley, members of the movement strategy core team, and external consultants are exploring options to move the contents of the conference into a series of virtual events.
Have something for the next newsletter? Add it to our June 2020 draft.
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. This month, as part of Wikimedia NYC's commitment to the well-being of members, we will hold WikiWednesday online via Zoom videoconferencing! To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I know how to use talk pages on Wikipedia now. I'm sorry if I didn't talk back at first and I just want to be unblocked. TylerKutschbach
@TylerKutschbach: It's alright! Glad you are now. Now, as for the Columbus article, I changed that template to allow for 1812 population data, from when the city was first settled. This is important context, and should stay. ɱ(talk)04:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I've noticed you've chimed in at the talk page regarding my recent RfC proposal. I'd like to know further of the apparent opposition to my proposal, as I can't find it and you haven't further elaborated following your referencing of it. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 26
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Honeynut squash for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
With your help, I can add an appropriate inline citation where his exact birth is mentioned in the article. I appreciate it, as I'm just trying to be conscious, and sensitive, to WP:BLPPRIMARY etc. Thank you so much. Missvain (talk) 05:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Miscellaneous
.svg){kind=icon}
