Ruffryder: Meet Her, Greet Her, Ph33r Her
editRuffryder is a bit rude, so if she's said something to you that sounds rude than, please, excuse her. She likes to add whatever she thinks she knows to a conversation so shecomes off as a know-it-all; especially when it comes to dogs, especially Australian Shepherds, German Shepherds (her white GSD rants are famous) and, occasionally, Rough Collies. She can actually be nice if you're nice to her, and she likes people that are willing to listen and can provide a nice, clean debate. She's had people get nasty. She also likes to speak in third person.
Ruffryder Quick Facts | ||
---|---|---|
Name: | Ruffryder | |
Nickname: | Ruffie | |
Gender: | Female | |
Pets: | Ziggy (male cat ), Tosh (female cat), Indigo (male Australian Shepherd ) | |
Activity level: | High | |
Learning rate: | High | |
Temperament: | Stubborn, moody, psychotic | |
Hobbies: | Dogs, drawing, roleplaying, writing | |
Currently Working on: | Wikipedia and Fallyria (her roleplay site) | |
Loves: | Animals, drawing, roleplaying, writing, her animals, being herself (sometimes), summer, autumn, agility with her puppy (yay!) | |
Loathes: | Chatspeak, 1337, illiterates, people that like to tell you what you can and can't do without reason, anyone like her (it's okay for her to be that way, but no one else is allowed to. =O Well, sometimes. If they're nicer than her.), abusive peoples | |
"The success for all employment as an assistant of man depends in the first place on expert leadership, whereby the dog is always put in just the right place, and where the man is so well-aquainted with the peculiarities of the dog that he always knows how to interpret correctly the meaning of the dog's signs. A leader without expert knowledge of and affection for the dog will achieve only mediocre results with the best trained dog: while an expert dog-loving leader can achieve good results with a dog of only fair capacity. In other words, the whole question is not only a question of the dog, but quite as much, if not more so, a question of the fitness of the leader." --Max v Stephanitz
--Ruffryder [x. thinksshescool] 7:27, 17 April 2007