User:Msrasnw/Philosophy/Philosophical terminology
Intro Ph.
The language of argumentation
editNeed to be able to:
- within a text identify
- and be able to analyse and evaluate arguments in ways appropriate to their form. This should include looking at validity/invalidity, soundness/unsoundness, certainty/probability of the arguments
- and be able to recognise and deal appropriately with different types of arguments/reasoning,
- this should include both arguments from analogy and from hypothetical reasoning (including Ockham’s Razor)
- Also need to be able to :
- recognise and deal appropriately with any possible flaws in arguments
- these include - the following: circularity, contradictions, question-begging and other fallacies
- examples and counter-examples should be known
- these include - the following: circularity, contradictions, question-begging and other fallacies
- recognise and deal appropriately with any possible flaws in arguments
- And finally be able generate arguments, and recognize objections and counter-arguments to these.
Key subkects
edit- God
- mind