User:Msrasnw/Philosophy/Philosophical terminology

Intro Ph.

The language of argumentation

edit

Need to be able to:

  • within a text identify
    • argument or arguments
    • structure of an argument: this includes premises (this includes assumptions), reasons, and conclusions (sub-conclusions should also be noted). Inferences should be recognised.
    • forms of argument – especially deduction and induction (but also including abduction)
  • and be able to analyse and evaluate arguments in ways appropriate to their form. This should include looking at validity/invalidity, soundness/unsoundness, certainty/probability of the arguments
  • and be able to recognise and deal appropriately with different types of arguments/reasoning,
    • this should include both arguments from analogy and from hypothetical reasoning (including Ockham’s Razor)
  • Also need to be able to :
    • recognise and deal appropriately with any possible flaws in arguments
      • these include - the following: circularity, contradictions, question-begging and other fallacies
        • examples and counter-examples should be known
  • And finally be able generate arguments, and recognize objections and counter-arguments to these.

Key subkects

edit

Epistemology

Moral philosophy

Metaphysics

  • God
  • mind