This is what I said on February 4th, 2024. TL;DR: Not all Low-Power Stations are un-notable.
Ahem, Hold on... No Vote, let me explain: So... Like what Some Person (yes, that's the person's name, I ain't kidding) and WcQuidditch said, Low-Power Television stations are more likely to have no sources, therefore, unexpected (or expected, depending on some stuff) consequences, are more likely to not make Wikipedia's Notability Rules. I mean this with all honesty, I hope that Wikipedia doesn't look at this stations and others and presume that All Low-Power Stations are not-notable. Some of them are notable but if they made a rule that says that Low-Power TV Stations are non-notable, I feel like that wouldn't end well for a lot of stations. And to also add a bit of irony in this situation, if there's a really short radio article, we don't pit a AfD on it, we call it a stub article, and we also wound do that on Full-Power TV stations, but only Low-Power ones are put under either PROD or AfD. Like, it feels like we are probably taking a All or Nothing approach on Low-Power Stations; Take a look of the K04QR-D AfD, it started out of a station in California, which led to a jumbled mess which literally 75%-85% of all HC2/Innovate Corporation LOW-POWER stations were involved in, which led to a No-Consensus. Like, if that went successful, that should've also took all of the Full-Power stations since, they technically lost their notability that made no sense. Either we just hate Low-Power Television or what the deal? Again, I'm neutral on this and I will not take any sides, okay? mer764KCTV(Talk) 03:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
— Mer764KC
.jpg)
United States
.png){kind=small}
