1,092
|
This User had read a lot of WP:PG :-(, in fact he had read for 2 weeks. :-(
Reference best practices
editThis practice is facultative neither is it a policy nor a guideline of Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects.
Scope
editThis user page gives my reference best practices that I frequently use. It ONLY discusses the process of selecting sources.
Audience
editIt MAY intended to anyone who is interested in citing better, and those who are wikiholic. Or who spend 500 hours of their lives on Wikipedia.
Prerequisite
editThere is only one prerequisite: The will of finding references for a very very loooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnggggg time (WARNING: I did that for around 200 hours).
Benefits of reading this page
editIt SHOULD make u more a reliable editor, as referencing is a HUGGE Part of WP.
WHy DiD i wRiTE diz?
editI found that after reading WP:CS, it was disguistingly long. And many WP articles cites disguisting sources. :(
They should replace that with this simple phrase: "All that we care is the information, how did it (the source) get that information (i.e. origin)? what can influence the contents (i.e. influence)?" as simple as that.
Another is: Thou shalt find "all" primary sources even if its exhaustive.
Willfull violation
edit§WHy Did i wRiTE diz? is a willfull violation of MOS:HEAD sentence case rule.
Discourse format
editQuid novi?
editI am now learning intellectual property.