May 2006
editHelp
edit
|
Nice to see someone who moved from anonymous to registered user! :D ~Kylu (u|t) 02:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Clock Vandalism
editHello, you sent me a message concerning the "testing" on the Clock page. I did not post that up, but simply erased it. It appeared more like vandalism to me. The user had also posted similar nonsense on the Algerian Civil war page. (Unsigned message from IP address).
- Replied on user's talk page.
Op Meghdoot
editHi, while there are no set rules for See Also section, I found that during the process of nominating Kargil War article for Featured Article (FA) status, some users expressed that the section was redundant (atleast for a FA status) and thus I try to include all that can be incorporated directly into the article. Some other inclusions do deserver a separate See Also section for further reading within Wikipedia. Normally these links are those that can't be included in the article but surely need to be mentioned. And I've prepared a list of closely linked operations in the Kashmir area as well and others. Please take a look now and probably the idea should be clear. Thanks. Idleguy 03:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Deletion
editIn addition to {{subst:afd}} for Articles for Deletion, there is also {{subst:prod|reason for deletion}} if you want to use Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (which is a good idea if you don't think this will be a contentious issue and the article obviously falls short of accepted guidelines) or {{db|reason for speedy deletion}} if this falls under the criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. In the specific case of Totalise, this could have been tagged as {{copyvio|www.thewebsitecontentisfrom.com}} and then add it to to the appropriate Wikipedia:Copyright problems subpage. Of course it is always courtesy to contact the originator first and explain the issues with the article.--Isotope23 16:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Reminder...
edit03:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
This unsigned message was added by IanManka.
Re: Nice page
editThanks :) — FireFox (U T C) 19:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Russian Mafia editor
editI have blocked the editor already anyway, for vandalism. 3RR applies to content disputes only, was there one as well? Kusma (討論) 21:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Thanks
editThank you for defending my user page ! Travelbird 16:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Okay, I changed it to a next level, as they have vandalised RoboCop again. I do not know how to block though, or if I can. Still new to RC Patrol. ;) ~Linuxerist E/L/T 22:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- I just realised before you sent it to me, and the ip is now listed. Also, no harm done, but I have twice as many edits, and have been here a couple monthes longer than you. Therefore, welcome to Wikipedia to you! ~Linuxerist E/L/T 22:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm a quality man myself! Only been here a week (registered), but have used Wikipedia since what feels like the beginning of time. EvocativeIntrigue 22:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Bradgate Park - Newtown Linford
editHi, couldn't leave a message before as I had not created a User ID. I live 5 minutes from Newtown Linford and am 100% confident of its spelling... Just trying to improve accuracy! Check a UK Road Atlas if you need to be convinced. Parsley2006 07:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page- Google returns results for both!
Userpage revert
editNo problem :)--Shanel § 20:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
(Untitled Message)
edithi i just thought having the priory lsst contact details on the page is not advertising. i am a student there myself so you may think i am bisist but trust me there is no need to advertise the priory.
- Replied to unsigned message on IP user's talk page (here).
Post riders
editAnswered in the topics disscussion page - go right ahead with my blessing --DV8 2XL 21:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Your edit, which you described as "Expansion + cleanup", in fact consisted solely of the addition (wrongly "subst"ed) of {{fact}} (which is neither expansion nor clean-up). As the information is given in the web pages provided in the "sources" section, it's not clear why you added this in any case. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied to on user's talk page.
Thanks for clearing that up. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied to on user's talk page.
WikiLove
edit~Linuxerist E/L/T has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}} or {{subst:smile2}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
Howdy!
editI just complete reading the revised article of the "Four Dead in Five Seconds gunfight" and I was pleasantly surprised to see what a great job you did! It was very clear. This gunfight was pretty confusing for many so it posed some challenge to try make the contents clear and who did what.
Being pretty new to here, I would, very much, like to learn how you did the formats. It was professionally done and would enjoy creating more of these like yours. I find it very educational and relaxing coming to Wikipedia when I'm hungry for new information.
Thank you so much and please do continue to provide me with feedbacks. My hat off and good day!
Tex
- Replied to on user's talk page.
June 2006
editAnon at Afghanistan
editThey're not updating the statistics, they're changing it to show the old Taliban flag and changing the leader to Mohammed Omar. It's simple vandalism, in my opinion, it's probably the work of Lazistan (talk · contribs), who I caught uploading Jihad flags to the Lazistan article. Ciao. —Khoikhoi 19:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Thanks, the reason why the talk page was empty is because they have a dynamic IP (it changes all the time), but if you look at the history of the page all the IPs that have been changing it start with 87. List it on WP:RPP for semi-protection if it gets worse. —Khoikhoi 20:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
My barnstar
editOooh, thank you! It's purty, I love it! Weregerbil 18:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Dog packing
editThe term Dog hiking is more popular than Dog packing. Spacepotato 22:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
LGS
editYeah, it probably is best to point LGS to the disambig page.--Drat (Talk) 05:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Lazistan
editYou can do it if you want. BTW, nice picture! ;) —Khoikhoi 21:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
The IPs are apparently in Berlin. Just use this website. As for the copyright status of the images, simply list them as WP:PUI and tag the images appropriately. Thanks for the smile! :) —Khoikhoi 01:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Grammar
editIn June 2005 and On June 2005. Which sounds better? This concerns your edit to Daniel5127's userpage. ForestH2.
- Hmm, if it was a specific date, such as 9th August 2006, I'd say on, but, in retrospect, in is probably more suitable here. There's no real point in reverting the page so many times, though- we could offer to help with his English, and perhaps correct his userpage for him, but I'd only do this with his consent- some users get (perhaps understandably) upset at repeated edits to their userpage.
- Do you know the IP address that's been making the edits by any chance?
- (Comment reposted at appropriate page/title here changed for spelling, previously grammer).
EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 14:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Ahh yes I do. It's actually my IP. Since I'm getting ready to leave the English Wikipedia I've been editing under an IP a lot. --ForestH2
- Replied on user's talk page.
I'll be around a bit. Expect to see me, I don't know-one edit to five edits every week some weeks no edits. I will be on Simple English Wikipedia though. ForestH2
- Replied on user's talk page. The remainder of this message has been archived, please see above.
Questions
editi couldnt get my doubt clarified.i was asking tht whether i could answer any questions related to science subjects..that wikipedia users ask on the wikipedia reference desk ....if it is possible how can i answer plss could u tell me The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vedula.himaja?
- Replied on user's talk page.
Civility
editIn response to: Please remain WP:CIVIL on Wikipedia, including in your edit summaries. Take note of no personal attack guidelines too!
Happy editing,
EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 11:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- I am growing increasingly shortempered about reverts for the wrong reasons. If people have questions/concerns about my edits then the proper thing to do is to ask for clarification rather than blindly revert well-meant contributions, which is happening all to often. I guess it is time for me to move on, and stop wasting my time and energy on contributing to Wikipedia. JdH 12:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on user's talk page.
Dude
editwhy don't you stop, i just made sure wikipedia's "high quality" was maintained...
- (User had made several vandal-like edits to my talk page after reminding him to use edit summaries from a boilerplate message.)
- Whilst your edits are fine (to a point), you should make a mental note of this.
- EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 18:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there - why did you add the cleanup tag to Leo the Lion (MGM)? I have removed it as the page does not seem to be in an "unfit state", so to speak. I apologise for my somewhat rude language, but if you could leave a message on the Leo the Lion talk page why you think it needs to be cleaned up, it would be appreciated (alternatively, talk to me).
- LBM (talk) 20:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page, also posted comments on article's talk page.
Hello there, I started the article, which is probably why I seemed kind of rude. I will attempt to cleanup (and I hope that others will help) and once again, I apologize for removing the tag.
- LBM (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page, also posted comments on article's talk page.
No problem! I am now attemping to cleanup the article, please let me know if it needs further attention.
LBM has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
- LBM (talk) 16:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the motto: some mention of Ars Gratia Artis is probably warranted. Maybe it should be mentioned in the opening lines? I'll add it there, but of course tell me if it needs moving.
- LBM (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied to on user's talk page.
Conseil National de la Résistance
editThanks for your reply to my Help Desk query. I finished translating the French article and placed it at Conseil National de la Résistance as you suggested. The article didn't turn out as interesting as I had thought; it's largely a laundry list of the individuals and groups who founded it, and doesn't go into detail on the actual guerilla activity the Conseil coordinated (if any). The article could do with some copyediting; when I translate from French, I usually end up with a lot of run-on sentences that do not flow very well in English. --Mathew5000 19:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
I replied at Talk:Conseil National de la Résistance to your last message on my talk page.--Mathew5000 00:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Thanks for the copyediting job! A definite improvement. I reworked the article a little bit. I took out the reference to the Appeal of June 18 because as far as I can tell that speech did not directly encourage resistance movements inside France; it sought recruits for the Free French Forces (i.e. uniformed military rather than guerilla fighters). There was another phrase in the original French article saying essentially that Moulin was "captured on a denunciation". I think that the terminology is meant to imply that somebody betrayed Moulin to the SS; see the article Jean Moulin. It isn't exactly NPOV if that's what it's supposed to mean, so I just took it out of the English article. I also took out the word "kidnapping", which implies that the SS had no legal right to take him. I think that "capture" is the most NPOV term to use there, but "arrest" is also accurate considering that the German military forces were governing French territory at the time. --Mathew5000 20:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Have now been through the articles that interest me.
A short Esperanzial update
editAs you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Userpage awards
editHi EvocativeIntrigue! You've signed up to be a judge for the Esperanza User Page Award! You'll have three user pages to examine. The user pages you get coincide with your signup number. So if you signed up to be a judge in spot 1 than you will get nominations 1-3. Pick your favorite one, and list it in the finalist section. After all 5 judges have chosen a finalist it's time to award them 1-10 points in the four categories:
- Attractiveness: general layout, considering colour scheme and/or use of tables if applicable
- Usefulness: links to subpages or editing aids, helpful information
- Interesting-ness: quirky, unique, captivating, or funny content
- General niceness: at the judges' discretion
Please see the Scores section on this page for additional information on your job as a judge.
Keep in mind that your scores are confidential! Email Petros471 with your scores and final picks. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced! Thanks.
Petros471 20:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I should point out, just choose your finalist at this stage. Do not try and email me the scores because my email is broken! Let me know if you have any questions. Petros471 20:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Greetings: Esperanza
editThanks :) The lagest Esperanza spamming is done by a bot. The thing you might be interested in is being official spammer for the userpage awards, giving out templates like this one:
Hi EvocativeIntrigue! You've signed up to be a judge for the Esperanza User Page Award! You'll have three user pages to examine. The user pages you get coincide with your signup number. So if you signed up to be a judge in spot 1 than you will get nominations 1-3. Pick your favorite one, and list it in the finalist section. After all 5 judges have chosen a finalist it's time to award them 1-10 points in the four categories:
- Attractiveness: general layout, considering colour scheme and/or use of tables if applicable
- Usefulness: links to subpages or editing aids, helpful information
- Interesting-ness: quirky, unique, captivating, or funny content
- General niceness: at the judges' discretion
Please see the Scores section on this page for additional information on your job as a judge.
Keep in mind that your scores are confidential! Email Petros471 with your scores and final picks. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced! Thanks.
Now my email is working you can forward me your scores for the current round. Petros471 13:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Happy first-edit anniversary!
editI noticed it's the anniversary of your first edit today, so thought I'd pop by with a cake I made!
EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 23:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
?
editWhen did I write abusive edit summaries? 63.23.86.210 01:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Err...here. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 23:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 01:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry. :( :( :( :( :( I won't do it anymore. 63.23.86.210 01:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I will register. :) 63.23.86.210 01:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Where do you get those big smileys from?63.23.86.210 01:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talk page.
- Resized image for archiving purposes.