User:DASHBotAV/False Positive Reports

This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

DASHBot Anti-Vandalism
Home · Regular-Expression List · Excluded Titles · Message List · Requests · Recent Actions Log · Error Report Generator · False Positives · Emergency Bot Shutoff

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: Cineplex (talk) made an edit to the page: Marmaduke (film)
The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:12:09
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 68
Regexs matched:

(?i)s+([^a-z]?)e+\1?x+\1?(e+\1?d+\1?|y+\1?|i*\1?e+\1?(s|r)+\1?(t\1?)?)?

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

To do.. fix so sex has less of a score, or make higher score threshold for this size edit. Tim 1357 ^talk 20:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Fixed Tim 1357 ^talk 20:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: Skverma97130 (talk) made an edit to the page: Samuel Taylor Coleridge
The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:05:18
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 81
Regexs matched:

[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Not a false positive, but questionable...

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: Allnightlong44 (talk) made an edit to the page: Wouldn't You
The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:04:51
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 1
Regexs matched:

[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: Fixed Tim 1357 ^talk 20:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: Hemlock Martinis (talk) made an edit to the page: Barbro Owens-Kirkpatrick
The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:00:47
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 20
Regexs matched:

(?i)n+([^a-z]?)i+\1?g+\1?g*\1?(e+\1?r+\1?|a+\1?)[sz]*\1?

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: Y Fixed Tim 1357 ^talk 20:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: 86.134.35.25 (talk) made an edit to the page: [[��lvaro Arbeloa]]
The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:03:45
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 8
Regexs matched:

[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: Already Fixed

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: Trecel (talk) made an edit to the page: Enrique Lambatan
The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:53:39
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 12
Regexs matched:

[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 75.73.209.32 (talk) made an edit to the page: Farmers of Forty Centuries
The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:38:31
The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 143
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

([A-Z]{3,}[\s\n\!]{,4}){3,}
(?i)(19|20)\d\d

Report Genorated: 00:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Not sure. Sole Soul (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, this matched the Screaming regex. It has caused me so much trouble that I think I'll turn it entirely off. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 98.237.225.159 (talk) made an edit to the page: J. R. Richards
The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:15:26
The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 61
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

([A-Z]{3,}[\s\n\!]{,4}){3,}

Report Genorated: 00:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: This has already been fixed. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: Kindzmarauli (talk) made an edit to the page: Kate Pierson
The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:57:45
The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 319
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)a+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|s+\1?t+\1?)|s+\1?)?
(?i)(19|20)\d\d

Report Genorated: 00:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: Fixed. This would have been not reverted because it included ref tags. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 86.83.145.54 (talk) made an edit to the page: Professor Dr. Sospeter Muhongo
The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:51:51
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 49
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

([A-Z]{3,}[\s\n\!]{,4}){3,}

Report Genorated: 00:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: "Genorated" in "Report Genorated" above is a typo, it should be "Generated"

User Comments

Bad edit, but vandalism probably was not intended. Sole Soul (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I can't see that edit, but it is the product of the aforementioned screwey regex that has since been changed to be much less inclusive. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for correcting my typo, I fixed it in the script. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 75.33.141.168 (talk) made an edit to the page: List of diplomatic missions in Panama
The bot discovered this: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:42:28
The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was -387
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

[A-Z][^a-z]{30,}

Report Generated: 19:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Rotsor

User: Rotsor (talk) made an edit to the page: Braga
The bot discovered this: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:21:09
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was -17
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

[A-Z][^a-z]{30,}

Report Generated: 00:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: Removed altogether. Tim 1357 ^talk 00:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 96.54.179.70 (Diff:379549496)

The swear is part of the bands name "the fuck you pigs" is a band that the cretin, a member of the dayglo abortions plays for. i added it to associated acts.

Thank you for your report. That band name has been whitelisted. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tim 1357 ^talk 12:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Tim1357 (Diff:379536927)

take a look at this.

False positive report from JohnCD (Diff:379603862)

Newbie user submitted a page, which was tagged A7; newbie then blanked it, and Dashbot reverted and issued a warning. This is WP:BITEy and very confusing for a newbie; Dashbot needs to be able to distinguish "page blanked by author" and either leave it alone or tag with {{db-g7}}. (Made worse here because two human editors then did the same thing. Now to apologise to the newbie and educate the other two... ) JohnCD (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Done, I saw that just five minutes before you did (in fact I think it happened twice). I'll leave an apology as well. Thanks for not getting angry :). Tim 1357 ^talk 18:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from BelindaEdgeworth (Diff:379643271)

I'm sorry, I'm new to this and didn't know about "the sandbox"; the frequency of small changes and edits subsequent to proofreading is I assume what attracted the notice of the bot and prompted the reversal of changes which, while not very substantial, were certainly not vandalism.

Very sorry. I replied on BE's talk page. Tim 1357 ^talk 21:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 108.5.66.83 (Diff:379819169)

false positive on the bot... the quote by greg proops is misrepresented and erroneous, and the bot won't allow correction of this.

Hmm, terribly sorry about that. The bot went down for a bit, so the 1 Revert Rule was ignored. Im going to look into how to make this better. Tim 1357 ^talk 19:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 199.247.84.65 (Diff:379837965)

Added the band Fuck Buttons to the list of musicians and groups using the Casiostereo keyboard. They do use it, as mentioned in the Fuck Buttons page.

Added to white list. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and sorry for the inconvenience. Tim 1357 ^talk 13:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from EvilExe (Diff:379864536)

Removed censoring of the word "fucking."

Working on it. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, and sorry for the inconvenience. Tim 1357 ^talk 13:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from JohnCD (Diff:379913591)

This is a more difficult one, but once again a user was trying (less politely this time) to remove his own autobiographical page, and was enraged by being reverted and accused of vandalism both by Dashbot and by humans. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. That seems to be deleted. I cant really fix it without being able to see it, so maybe you can email the diff to me here. Thanks, Tim 1357 ^talk 13:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Without having seen the article, maybe I'll add an exception for authors of pages. That is to say, if a user created an article, then they cannot be reverted on that page. Tim 1357 ^talk 14:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 65.25.33.88 (Diff:379964557)

I removed the censoring of "bullshit" (written as b******t) from Taleb's page and replaced it with the real word. That's not vandalism! Wikipedia is not supposed to be censored... :(

You're right and I'm working on it. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tim 1357 ^talk 13:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 99.27.235.78 (Diff:379886382)

There are at least 2 of the games that I personally own that I edited the page about. I couldn't pst a link to it because you removed the page about the game. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Illusion_%28company%29 however proves that there is a company that exists that has both the games I own and the other one that I intend to obtain in the future. I would appreciate if you would not remove my post while trying to help other people know more about the games from certain developers.

False positive report from 76.109.242.141 (Diff:380093034)

Profanity is not vandalism, every page you have on this site is pure opinion by users with no true fact verification. What some may find to be true others may consider fake. The fact that you veto what you feel is accurate and fraudulent is asinine. Your site is founded on freedom of speech but you show no consideration for such fact. If people consider my post to be free speech they will change it accordingly that is the beauty of wikipedia. Automatically remove said comments does not allow freedom of expression and only allows what you believe is accurate. I am very disappointed in what censure has been placed on this site

Sorry, but this is defiantly not a false positive. Take a look at the intro to wikipedia. Tim 1357 ^talk 13:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)r

False positive report from 79.138.187.64 (Diff:380030018)

While I can guess, it is unclear why my slight change to the article about Vanessa Paradis was not considered constructive.

On the contrary, any cached version of that page could be retrived in the future and give the wrong impression that it is generally not considered controversial for a non-married couple to have children out of wedlock in our time. By labelling their children as "illegitimate" or "bastard", it will convey the sense that not everyone in our time approved of such arrangements without necessarily suggesting that *all* people disapprove. Someone who does not find anything wrong with having illegitimate children would not object to the label "illegitimate". It think it is important to convey that in our time that we did not all excuse our celebrity entertainers for actions that would have common laypeople labelled.

False positive report from 69.234.107.29 (Diff:381021682)

i edited a quote. someone had replaced the word "fucking" with "(bleep)ing" in a quote from mark wahlberg, which i felt was unnecessary and dangerous to free speech, so i fixed it.

False positive report from 173.52.67.121 (Diff:381047699)

Wrong track listing you tool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.67.121 (talk • contribs)

Sorry about that. Your edit got caught in the filter for the word "dumb". I tweaked it so that "dum" by itself will not get caught, but "dummy" will. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tim 1357 ^talk 15:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 99.183.193.109 (Diff:381048766)

I change the mascot of St Thomas from "the eagles" to "eagles" and it reported me. That is absurd! Dashbot needs to be shut off.

Hah. Maybe not. Tim 1357 ^talk 15:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 71.21.195.23 (Diff:381000333)

The text added was Danny McBride's most notable line from the movie, given as a point of reference for mainstream fans.

False positive report from 24.8.14.9 (Diff:381567087)

I disagree with DashBot's revision back to the original page on my revisions to "The Big Lebowski". I believe the article to be mostly sound, but there are several places where I feel it is sloppily written and leaves out certain major plot points as to make the synopsis somewhat incomprehensible. Please consider keeping my revisions in. Thank you.

Terribly sorry about that. I tweaked the bots settings, so this type of error will not happen again. Thanks for reporting it! Tim 1357 ^talk 21:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Spencro (Diff:381755479)

The edit added detail to the nature of the prize that this author has won. The prize is not a well-known one, and is not featured on Wikipedia, so the additional detail is useful for clarification.

False positive report from Jdawg94 (Diff:381803373)

My edit was true!

Hah, almost had me there. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Robber93 (Diff:381813331)

I changed the redirect page for "Boob Lady", as the old page redirected to a page of one time Simpsons characters where her name didn't exist on the page. I changed the redirect to a different page of recurring characters (she makes 2 appearances throughout the series).

Very Sorry. This edit would not have been reverted today, as I added an exclusion for large edits, such as this. Thanks for alerting me. Tim 1357 ^talk 14:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Sole Soul (Diff:381831398)

[1]. Sole Soul (talk) 07:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Hyperhippy92 (Diff:381915107)

I was simply explaining how the closed captioning was in fact, uncensored, on a reference of a certain episode of Family Guy in the Robot Chicken page, and also, given the massive quantities of the phrase, "F--k you!" in that page, I thought another use of it wouldn't hurt... but this is why Wikipedia should be censored with partial reverts instead of full reverts, AND NOT FULL REVERTS! Also, if saying "F--k" is so wrong, I say that the whole reference section be deleted, and not by revert either, someone needs to take the time, and delete the entire reference section the old way, by editing the page, highlighting the section, and pressing the backspace or delete key like a normal person, and not automatically revert a page to it's previous state like a robot. If I can't say "F--k" on a page full of "F--k"'s, then no one can say "F--k", period, even if it's a page on the history of the word "F--k".

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 207.6.49.207 (talk) made an edit to the page: The Wrestler (2008 film)
The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:13:18
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 8
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)b+u+tt+[sz\$]*

Report Generated: 02:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

"headbutt" is a pro wrestling term , see Professional_wrestling_aerial_techniques#Diving_headbutt. Sole Soul (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and fixed. Tim 1357 ^talk 11:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 81.153.73.91

User: 81.153.73.91 (talk) made an edit to the page: Gang colors
The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:25:26
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 4
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 15:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

This is probably not a false positive. The bot was correct in its revert. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 18:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Yep. Tim 1357 ^talk 22:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Wottnot

User: Wottnot (talk) made an edit to the page: Exhibitionism
The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:41:34
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 39
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(t+[i\!1]+t+|b+[o0]{2,}b+)([i\!1]+e+[s\$]+|y+|[sz]+)?

Report Generated: 22:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Fixed Tim 1357 ^talk 23:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 71.68.203.101

User: 71.68.203.101 (talk) made an edit to the page:
The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:25:38
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 144
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(b+u+ll+|d+[o0]+g+|c+[o0]+w+|d+u+m+b+)?[\-]?[s\$]+([^a-z\s]?)h+\2?[i\!1]+\2?t+\2?((t+\2?)e+\2?(d|r)+\2?|[s\$]+\2?|z+\2?|t*\2?(y+|(i|y)+(\2?e+\2?[s\$]+\2?t+|l+\2?y+|e+\2?r+))\2?)?

Report Generated: 22:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Fixed Tim 1357 ^talk 23:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 205.237.167.169

User: 205.237.167.169 (talk) made an edit to the page: Okapi
The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:03:32
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 14
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)w+[\@a4]+[\$sz]+ h+e+r+e+
W+[\@A4]+[\$SZ]+ H+E+R+E+

Report Generated: 23:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Nope. Tim 1357 ^talk 23:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 67.184.68.87

User: 67.184.68.87 (talk) made an edit to the page: Fucking, Austria
The bot discovered this: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:05:39
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(p+h+|f+)([^a-z]?)u+\2?(c+\2?k+|k+\2?c*)\2?(e+\2?r+\2?[\$sz]*\2?|[s\$]+\2?|(i|e)+\2?n+\2?(g+\2?)?|e+\2?d+\2?)?

Report Generated: 01:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: I had an exlusion for pages with 'bad words' in their title. I turned that function off for some reason, and forgot to turn it back on. Done. Tim 1357 ^talk 10:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: Fed250 (talk) made an edit to the page: The Buckethead Show
The bot discovered this: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:26:18
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 32
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)b+[o0]{2,}g+e+r+[sz\$]*

Report Generated: 21:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Sole Soul (talk) 21:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Tweaked the regex for 'boogers' to be less harsh. Tim 1357 ^talk 13:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 86.28.149.134

User: 86.28.149.134 (talk) made an edit to the page: Two-Spirit
The bot discovered this: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:29:13
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 42
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 17:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Fixed Tim 1357 ^talk 02:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 24.46.68.224

User: 24.46.68.224 (talk) made an edit to the page: Spring Heeled Jack
The bot discovered this: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:21:51
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)p+u+[s\$]{2,}(i|y)+e*[zs]*

Report Generated: 00:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments: I don't see how this was an appropriate edit. Can you explain why it was? Tim 1357 ^talk 13:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Bigger digger

User: 72.28.58.38 (talk) made an edit to the page: Shane Dawson
The bot discovered this: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:47:08
The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 223
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)f+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?g+\1?(g+\1)?(([o0]|[i\!1])+\1?t+\1?)?[zs\$]*\1?
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 04:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Confusing article, so I might be wrong. I stumbled across the IP after it later made mass deletions to a different article, but I think it has been false-positived here due to the re-arranging of two uses of the word "faggot" that were already in the article. Hope that makes sense, most of the article didn't! Bigger digger (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 90.194.3.241

User: 90.194.3.241 (talk) made an edit to the page: List of number-one hits of 2010 (France)
The bot discovered this: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:36:39
The bot determined the score was -5, and the edit size was 6
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(rotf)?lmf?(h|[\@a4])[o0]
(ROTF)?LMF?(H|[\@A4])[O0]
(?i)\([^\(\)]+?\)

Report Generated: 00:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Missing in the article was the featuring music group LMFAO, which was correctly put in the article. Bot has reverted edit wrongly thinking user wrote something else. 90.194.3.241 (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 24.184.103.149

User: 24.184.103.149 (talk) made an edit to the page: Waifu
The bot discovered this: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:37:56
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 9
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(\[\^\+?\]\]|\{\{[^\}]+?\}\})
<Replaced content with someting esle, as acording to edit summary.>

Report Generated: 06:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

The intention of the edit was to replace a redirect I considered spam (such things crop up, for instance something such as "Flaming homosexual" -> "Gerard Way") with a speedy delete template. --24.184.103.149 (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Tim 1357 ^talk 21:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

User: 75.202.130.63 (talk) made an edit to the page: Rudy Gay
The bot discovered this: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:20:39
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 5
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 14:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 79.11.199.154

User: 79.11.199.154 (talk) made an edit to the page: NSFW. A hunter shoots a bear!
The bot discovered this: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:14:29
The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 43
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(b+u+ll+|d+[o0]+g+|c+[o0]+w+|d+u+m+b+)?[\-]?[s\$]+([^a-z\s]?)h+\2?[i\!1]+\2?t+\2?((t+\2?)e+\2?(d|r)+\2?|[s\$]+\2?|z+\2?|t*\2?(y+|(i|y)+(\2?e+\2?[s\$]+\2?t+|l+\2?y+|e+\2?r+))\2?)?

Report Generated: 13:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Teohhanhui

User: Teohhanhui (talk) made an edit to the page: Kevin Walker (Brothers & Sisters)
The bot discovered this: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:55:21
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 14:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 190.140.32.211

User: 190.140.32.211 (talk) made an edit to the page: Virtual Diva
The bot discovered this: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:03:14
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 21
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 15:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 71.204.179.150

User: 71.204.179.150 (talk) made an edit to the page: Dynamite (Taio Cruz song)
The bot discovered this: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:52:30
The bot determined the score was -5, and the edit size was 4
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)p+[o0]{2,}p*(e+d+|e+r+|[sz\$]+)?

Report Generated: 22:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 24.45.6.38

User: 24.45.6.38 (talk) made an edit to the page: The Town (2010 film)
The bot discovered this: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:58:52
The bot determined the score was -10, and the edit size was 520
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(p+h+|f+)([^a-z]?)u+\2?(c+\2?k+|k+\1?c*)\2? *\2?((y+\2?[o0]+\2?)?u+\2?|u+\2?[s\$]+\2?|h+\2?(e+\2?r+\2?|[i\!1]+\2?m+\2?)|t+\2?h+\2?(e+\2?m+|[i\!1]+\2?[s\$]+|[\@a4]+\2?t+\2?)\2?|m+\2?e+\2?|[o0]+\2?f\2?f+\2?)
(?i)(p+h+|f+)([^a-z]?)u+\2?(c+\2?k+|k+\2?c*)\2?(e+\2?r+\2?[\$sz]*\2?|[s\$]+\2?|(i|e)+\2?n+\2?(g+\2?)?|e+\2?d+\2?)?
(?i)r+[\@a4]+p+(e|i)+(d+|[s\$]+t*|[i\!1]+n+g+)?
(?i)\"[^\"]+?\"

Report Generated: 03:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 206.116.161.228 (talk) made an edit to the page: List of Caprica characters
The bot discovered this: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:16
The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 03:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Sole Soul (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

User: 24.45.6.38 (talk) made an edit to the page: The Town (2010 film)
The bot discovered this: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:58:52
The bot determined the score was -10, and the edit size was 520
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(p+h+|f+)([^a-z]?)u+\2?(c+\2?k+|k+\1?c*)\2? *\2?((y+\2?[o0]+\2?)?u+\2?|u+\2?[s\$]+\2?|h+\2?(e+\2?r+\2?|[i\!1]+\2?m+\2?)|t+\2?h+\2?(e+\2?m+|[i\!1]+\2?[s\$]+|[\@a4]+\2?t+\2?)\2?|m+\2?e+\2?|[o0]+\2?f\2?f+\2?)
(?i)(p+h+|f+)([^a-z]?)u+\2?(c+\2?k+|k+\2?c*)\2?(e+\2?r+\2?[\$sz]*\2?|[s\$]+\2?|(i|e)+\2?n+\2?(g+\2?)?|e+\2?d+\2?)?
(?i)r+[\@a4]+p+(e|i)+(d+|[s\$]+t*|[i\!1]+n+g+)?
(?i)\"[^\"]+?\"

Report Generated: 04:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Suggest adding good score for the words "scene" and "movie". Sole Soul (talk) 04:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 212.159.45.2

User: 212.159.45.2 (talk) made an edit to the page: LMFAO (group)
The bot discovered this: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:45:54
The bot determined the score was -6, and the edit size was -12
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(rotf)?lmf?(h|[\@a4])[o0]
(ROTF)?LMF?(H|[\@A4])[O0]

Report Generated: 10:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 24.161.33.60

User: 24.161.33.60 (talk) made an edit to the page: National Vanguard (American organization)
The bot discovered this: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:52:27
The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 142
Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):

(?i)(b+u+ll+|d+[o0]+g+|c+[o0]+w+|d+u+m+b+)?[\-]?[s\$]+([^a-z\s]?)h+\2?[i\!1]+\2?t+\2?((t+\2?)e+\2?(d|r)+\2?|[s\$]+\2?|z+\2?|t*\2?(y+|(i|y)+(\2?e+\2?[s\$]+\2?t+|l+\2?y+|e+\2?r+))\2?)?
(?i)\([^\(\)]+?\)

Report Generated: 01:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False positive report from 174.1.72.167 (Diff:387646222)

I didn't do anything! What the heck!!?

Yes you did. This is clearly vandalism. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 21:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 98.18.49.226 (Diff:387670622)

I noted Dee Snyder make a guest appearance on Chappelle's Show on a segment entitled "Ask A Gay Dude" and it was flagged for vandalism.

False positive report from 117.199.108.93 (Diff:387720084)

By mistake

This was not a mistake. It was apparently vandalism if the word 'fuck' was intentionally added to a random place in the article. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 21:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Jimmw2ms (Diff:387862367)

Hello, I was adding known information and was told that I was in breach of something. Please advise.

False positive report from Master Of Tiggers (Diff:387909385)

The word is spelled lulz, not luls. I was merging my edit

False positive report from 76.189.162.7 (Diff:388827467)

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Use_Your_Illusion_I&oldid=388827470

I was avoiding redirects. 76.189.162.7 (talk) 03:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Zappafripp (Diff:388089054)

I moved a wrong information and DASHBot reverted it. I don't know why this. Anyway it was wrong to revert it.

False positive report from 67.208.104.130 (Diff:388120143)

False Positive

False positive report from 76.189.162.7 (Diff:388827467)

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Use_Your_Illusion_I&oldid=388827470

I was avoiding redirects. 76.189.162.7 (talk) 03:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 119.160.120.36 (Diff:388832097)

LMAO

Not a False Positive. 75.194.244.241 (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 74.216.53.250 (Diff:388834847)

I was reported for deleting two words that was not cited, sourced, or anything for that matter.

The two words were suspicious in the article

Fixed. Thanks. 75.194.244.241 (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Wikipurger (Diff:388842473)

Sorry, a slight mistake in editing.

False positive report from 86.7.155.0 (Diff:388918574)

i only added Apline Assualt which IS A MAP

Not a false positive. 75.213.219.78 (talk) 23:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 178.110.228.219 (Diff:388937026)

my edit of "devil went down to georgia" was:

revert of "son of a bitch", "son of a gun" mix-up

contrary to popular, incorrect, belief: the ORIGINAL line was "son of a gun" "son of a bitch" was recorded later...

False positive report from Tim1357 (Diff:388976147)

deal with this

False positive report from Swarna07 (Diff:389037468)

Hello, The article on the famous Indian Television star Rajat Tokas, priorly appeared as this http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ISpW7nTowqkJ:en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Rajat_Tokas+Rajat+Tokas&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in

But now due to some personal benefits it is redirect to another actresses page. It has deeply hurt the sentiments of Rajat Tokas fans. Kindly disable the redirect as soon as possible.

False positive report from Harlem Justice (Diff:389071977)

We posted, in neutral language, a US report on international human trafficking, and information from court-accredited experts. Following is what was reposted and we hope that human editors who do not like the facts in the world will not force us to report them to Wikipedia for real vandalism of the article by wiping out our submission without discussion.

The US Trafficking in Persons Report is an annual report that takes stock of the international human trafficking situation. The 2010 report, presented by Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, gave Canada Tier 1 status. On page 9, the report states "Prostitution by willing adults is not human trafficking regardless of whether it is legalized, decriminalized or criminalized." And, "Recent studies show that the majority of human trafficking in the world takes the form of forced labour. The ILO estimates that for every trafficking victim subjected to forced prostitution, nine people are forced to work." ^[1]

False positive report from Harlem Justice (Diff:389071977)

The US 2010 Trafficking in Persons report refers to and rates Canada. You have also removed information from the Canadian RCMP website and reference to a Canadian academic about prostitution in Canada. You have also added information re human trafficking in New Zealand. Kindly stop vandalizing this article. I am reporting you to Wikipedia.

False positive report from 86.169.136.35 (Diff:389166752)

i wrote fucken fab

N Not a false positive. 75.213.66.234 (talk) 23:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 68.98.65.88 (Diff:389189577)

I have recieved a false positive report, I am aware that to the best of my knowledge, the infromation I changed was correct when I changed it. My sources I used showed me that, and allowed me to use their source, but I could not cite them as a source because they do not want to be a source with the shield laws in place.

Not a false positives. 75.213.66.234 (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 71.97.55.109 (Diff:389209056)

Network requested logo removed from Wikipedia due to intellectual infringement from other site that use Wikipedia as their source.

Target page

Just noticed I made a false positive report at User:DASHBot/User:DASHBot/False Positive Reports and not here (lots of others have done the same). Perhaps, it is becasue of following some link that is incorrectly targeted. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 11:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from TehNumber (Diff:389415042)

I changed the ambiguous phrase "marriage equality" to the more appropriate phrase "gay marriage." DASHBot did not like that, I assume because it interprets any use of the word "gay" as an adjective to be vandalism - and though it would be correct in most cases, in this case it is a false positive.

Here is he original source (from page Brian_X._Foley):

Brian X. Foley seen as a key swing senate vote in 2009 Marriage Equality Debate in New York State. Beginning April 16, 2009 as Gov. Paterson introduces a bill that would establish marriage equality into the house.^[2] Foley voted in favor of marriage equality legislation on December 2, 2009, but the bill was defeated.^[3]

Here is the text after my edits:

Brian X. Foley seen as a key swing senate vote in 2009 Marriage Equality Debate in New York State. Beginning April 16, 2009 as Gov. Paterson introduces a bill that would legalize gay marriage. ^[4] Foley voted in favor of legalizing gay marriage on December 2, 2009, but the bill was defeated.^[5]

False positive report from W3stside42 (Diff:389464201)

What i wrote was true and very insignificant

False positive report from Piotrus (Diff:389525538)

This appears to be a false positive. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 15:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 97.78.129.61 (Diff:389591831)

its true he did fart

i like farting

False positive report from 96.23.71.174 (Diff:389793078)

This album really does suck.

False positive report from 58.173.101.23 (Diff:389832674)

k;ujk;uu;u;uoi

False positive report from Axel&Roxas1212 (Diff:389898816)

Fine i messed up once. sorry.

edited to no bad words

False positive report from 86.130.220.176 (Diff:389927218)

Hi, I am trying to add this discussion group to an article on conceptual art. It is an artistic movenment opposed to conceptiol art found here :

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Phuck-conceptual-art/

Although it may seem spirited it is a serious and passionate stage in the ongoing artistic dialectic and it should be seen as a genuine heartfelt opposing artistic movwement and not as the bot seems to think "unconstructive". Anything less would be simply censorship.

False positive report from Themuseman11 (Diff:389935027)

im very sorry

False positive report from 97.115.102.195 (Diff:390009368)

I changed Sheri's Ranch's page back to its original content that included the fact that Chuck Lee was a homicide detective in Chicago.

False positive report from 86.141.128.42 (Diff:390077085)

They reverted my edit, despite the fact it was constructive. [unsigned post from Anon IP 86.141.128.42 11Oct2010]

This anon user abused the False Positive link (after 4 blatantly disruptive/vulgar edits + 2 violations of Sandbox ettiquette), including blanking multiple warnings to the Talkpage.  DennisDallas (talk) 17:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 138.210.92.134 (Diff:390079277)

This report is malicious and false. I was just correcting some minor issues. It is well known that Lawrenceville is the seat of satan's earthly palace. Please bring sources to disprove this well-estabished knowledge.

False positive report from 86.140.9.137 (Diff:390149207)

My change on The Killing Tree page made the section easier to read, and I included a missing member in the list. This should not be considered a useless change, and therefore should be un-reverted.

False positive report from 96.32.189.118 (Diff:390173575)

I made a correction. The current page says it is impossible to penetrate two partners at once and I saw a video where it happened. Why include incorrect information? Link to evidence: http://xhamster.com/movies/457941/freaks_of_nature_2_dobble_cock.html

False positive report from 90.222.98.14 (Diff:390346673)

i was right he is a german??

False positive report from 86.42.31.84 (Diff:390589024)

don't false positive me, bro http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?diff=390589024

False positive report from 93.186.23.239 (Diff:389312285)

Hi there! Not sure about this message... I'm conected using my blackberry...

False positive report from 79.97.171.208 (Diff:391345002)

False positive

False positive report from 208.79.106.115 (Diff:391374842)

Whoever redirected the article to the Russell Terrier should not have done that. There is no breed of dog called the Australian Jack Russell Terrier and it's giving out false information to say it is this breed. Look it up on the AKC website. The Russell Terrier is a breed, there is no breed called the Australian Jack Russell Terrier. Someone created the redirect for their purposes and it causes confusion. Thank you.

False positive report from 75.50.151.91 (Diff:391381133)

The revert by this bot is incorrect. The word that was used in the interview is what i was putting back.

False positive report from 72.152.3.69 (Diff:391531375)

I was just correcting some grammer

False positive report from 98.244.221.189 (Diff:391533286)

idiot theres nothing wrong with my fat cat

False positive report from 68.63.76.58 (Diff:391542195)

he is president my teacher said

False positive report from Rambo's Revenge (Diff:391616449)

Although I'm completely unconnected to the IP that was warned, their edit was not vandalism. Not sure if you want to remove the warning from their user page or not. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 10:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Millrick10 (Diff:391702089)

Stop it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

False positive report from Robbgodshaw (Diff:391707230)

i was removing the censorship dashes. original word was f---, meaning fuck. I simply changed it to the more consise "fuck"

False positive report from Drsteevo (Diff:391770398)

I made a change that was identified as vandalism by DASHBot, however it was not vandalism. I corrected and included the full and un-edited text of the final statement by convicted murderer Todd Willingham. It does include coarse language, but I feel it is an important fact to include in this story. I have attached a footnote to a link that has an image of the statement so it is verified.

False positive report from Idyllchilde (Diff:391783682)

Falsely marked as vandalizing The Bourne Legacy (film) page, when I created an article and tried to redirect it correctly due to a spelling error in the title.

False positive report from SpikeToronto (Diff:391976529)

This was a false positive. Because the translation had both the words balls and ass, DASHBot thought it was something that should be reverted. I undid the DASHBot edit. Let’s hope it sticks. Thanks! — Spike Toronto 05:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 78.145.219.193 (Diff:392021702)

Speck Alto Adige PGI – how is adding references to the official EU documents construed as appearing to be unconstructive? 78.145.219.193 (talk) 13:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Cheesefrog (Diff:392056152)

My edit wasn't false. Could you please revert?

False positive report from 74.212.32.99 (Diff:392129023)

And Then There Were None is not about Asians. If anything, the revisions before mine that changed soldier, indian, and nigger to Asian and its variants were vandalism. I was simply trying to right that wrong.--74.212.32.99 (talk) 00:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

^ "2010 Trafficking in Persons Report" U.S.A., Department of State
^ http://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-stgay1512652703apr14,0,6501953.story
^ www.observer.com/2009/.../same-sex-marriage-failssenate-roll-call
^ http://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-stgay1512652703apr14,0,6501953.story
^ www.observer.com/2009/.../same-sex-marriage-failssenate-roll-call

[1] "2010 Trafficking in Persons Report" U.S.A., Department of State

[2] ttp://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-stgay1512652703apr14,0,6501953.story

[3] www.observer.com/2009/.../same-sex-marriage-failssenate-roll-call

[4] ttp://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-stgay1512652703apr14,0,6501953.story

[5] www.observer.com/2009/.../same-sex-marriage-failssenate-roll-call

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]