Clp064

Article Evaluation

1. I found everything in the article to be easily be related to the topic, which was music. This article covered different composers, different styles of music and genres. I would have liked if the information wasnt so much in a chart format, I found it a little hard to follow in the current format.
2. When it comes to the artist in the composers section, some of the information was out of date. I saw artist like Michael Jackson, Motorhead, and Greenday, to name a few. I think that the article may need to be updated with some current artist.
3. I also think that some more artist from different countries could be added that would really round out the article and make it very interesting.
4. There is a fairly classical feel to the article, like I mentioned above there are a lot of artist from further back in time that are relatively dated in today's time.
5. Again, like I mentioned above they really stick to the old school music, which there is nothing wrong with, but for the sake of the article it doesnt really show as much as it should in concern to current music.
6. For this article I couldnt find any citations to check, something I believe needs to be fixed.
7. I clicked on a few sources and it took me to their source pages. I believe all of the articles were accurate and they came from other wikipedia pages.
8. In the talk section I found information that wasnt relevant to my article. The talk subcatergories that were added included, items removed from this page, Wikiproject X Newsletter, changed from a taskforce to a project, women writers, and naming conventions.
9. The article I chose is a Wiki project.
10. The article's talk section is completley unrelated to the rest of the article. I dont know why this is so, if it is some kind of malfunction then I think it needs to be fixed.