User:Chzz/Blablaa

Grammar fixed from posts on User_talk:Blablaaa

Blablaaa, I have tried to work through your talk page posting, and tried to clarify the English. If you wish to use this translation - perhaps on the discussions - feel free to do so, but please mention that "This has been grammar-corrected by Chzz (talk · contribs)"

some input to the POV argument. Yes i have a account on the german wiki since my last Block. I wrote one article completly new 24 and edited battle of kursk.

Wikipe-tan says, Don't abbreviate Wikipedia as Wiki!

Some input to the POV argument; yes, I have had an account on the German Wikipedia since my last Block. I wrote one completely new article de:Belgorod-Charkiwer Operation and edited Battle of Kursk.

Notes: notice 'have had' - past perfect tense.

Always wikilink things. You can link to German Wikipedia with e.g. [[:de:Belgorod-Charkiwer Operation]].

"German" and "Kursk" are proper nouns, always capitals.

I was welcomed and iam respected i guess no one has a problem with my edits, they appreciate it. Please look there if u can read a bit german. I simply wrote the same there like here only in better german. I had no problems. But why ? on the german wiki no problems with my edits but on the english.

I was made welcome, and treated with respect; I thought that no one had a problem with my edits, that they appreciated them. Please look there if you can read a bit of German. I simply wrote the same there as here, only in better German (because my English is not great). I had no problems. But why ? On the German Wikipedia, I have had no problems with my edits.

That indicates simply that all people have POV and problems/discussion evolde when two POV collidate. i learned thats no problem we have to find consense. The english wiki is very ungerman POV i think. Exceptions are aerial warfare and biographies.Blablaaa (talk) 17:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

This indicates to me that all the people have POV and problems/discussion evolve when two POVs collide. I learned that that should not be a problem; we have to find a consensus. The English Wikipedia is very English-speaking-POV, in my opinion. Exceptions to this include aerial warfare and biographies .Blablaaa (talk) 17:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the ips which are now the main focus because nicks avoids to talk about his behaviour. here is my edit : 25 telling eyeseren admin that iam this ips without any question if iam this ip, i got in contact again with him so i told immediatly that iam was the ip( not all ).

Regarding the IP edits, which have become the main focus of this discussion, because Nick-D has avoided discussing his behaviour: In this edit I freely admitted to EyeSerene (talk · contribs) that they were my edits. I contacted him immediately, saying that some (not all) of the edits by that IP were me.

regarding the bahavaiour of this ip, ( me and some friends ) , totally iept, i dont contest any accusation. i came to the normandy article and was shocked over the pov ( in my opinion ), i talked like in forums were people try to dominate other users, i was angry i was annoying , many of my "vandal" edits were only to be pointy, i pointed on POV.

With regard to the behaviour of that IP user: Some of those edits were made by me, others were made by my friends. I came to the Normandy article, and I was shocked over the non-neutral point-of-view (in my opinion). I spoke about this as I would in a forum, and others tried to dominate the discussion. I was angry and annoyed; many of my 'vandal' edits were pointy, due to the POV issues.

i noticed the value of wiki changed my objectiv created an account started to edit articles without hiding my past. Go struck with other annother editor presenting his opposite POV. i again would explain that i would never get problems on german wiki ( and never got ). Blablaaa (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I read English Wikipedia articles about Normandy, and noticed the POV (in my opinion). I thought this was not the way that Wikipedia should work, so I created an account and began editing articles. I did not disguise my past. I became involved with another editor, who was presenting the opposing POV. I explained that I never had problems on the German Wikipedia Blablaaa (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

maybe somebody didnt see i link some comments of user: Paul Siebert 26 , i hope its ok for him. Blablaaa (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps you did not notice the of Paul Siebert. I sincerely hope that Paul does not need to become embroiled in this dispute.