User:Brews ohare/Arbitration notes

Arbitration notes

Sandstein enforces request by Blackburne “Consequently, per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light#Brews ohare restricted, I am hereby banning Brews ohare indefinitely from editing the article Speed of light and its talk page.”

Original appeal to limit length of Sandstein's ban denied as misfiled

Change of venue from AI/N to Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement apparently implies different arbitrators

Appeal to limit Sandstein's indefinite ban Moved to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement

Ruling based on complete sidestepping of appeal Brews ohare (talk · contribs) is topic banned from all physics-related pages, topics and discussions, broadly construed, for twelve months.

Discussion of inappropriate ruling

AN/I request to revert Headbomb's burying of pre-existing threads on Talk:Matter.

Headbomb takes me to ArbCom for protesting his actions on AN/I

All attempts to gain explanation of ArbCom action are stonewalled

Exchange with Ed Johnston leads to no clarification

Closed with a warning

Summary of status more

Blackburne takes me to WP:AE for posting a revision of an article he set up for AfD

Draconian remedy proposed in violation of all protocol

WGFinley admonishes me despite violation of fair-warning protocol His four-point admonition addresses misbehavior that did not occur, an outstandingly clear example of the tar baby syndrome of administration.

Attempt to railroad new censorship archived without clarification H in a B attempts to get clarification and several admins attempt unsuccessfully to morph this request into a lynching

Headbomb removes problem links to Aetherometry.com following my identification of this problem

Headbomb changes his mind about taking me to court over identification of Aetherometry.com links as problematical and removes my note of thanks to him for his generosity

Headbomb escalates matters to request a complete ban for raising the issues with Aetherometry.com

Timotheus Canens blocks me for my temerity, claiming reference to Aetherometry.com is a topic ban violation

Headbomb does it again with Timotheus Canens' support, again. Beeblebrox says no action short of a site ban is useful.

Comments to EdJohnston on the Headbomb charade: 1,2

Canens decides to seek further action No acknowledgment of my statement and my request to go beyond hearsay. A railroading of a preordained backroom decision window-dressed as a proceeding, with no attention paid to several useful and workable alternatives.