| Quicklinks |
|---|
| Other Excellent articles on CSD |
Original Article
editXXXXX invented the ceiling fan as well as the thought of zoophilia or animal sex. He created the idea of cunnilingus as well as the idea of pleasuring a woman's clitoris or a man's anal cavity. XXXXX was born April 22, 1990. He enjoys long walks on the beach, farm sex, and delicious chinese food. "Chinch" as he is called, is derived from his first pet, a chinchilla. Dylan says, "Chinch is the softest, most cuddly, animal on the planet and I would do him if I had the opportunity. Chinch currently resides in Dixhills, Long Island, NY. In Long Island he enjoys smoking joints and going on "L" rides with his boys. He believes that he rolls the best blunts and joints however he is completely mistaken. Currently, Chinch ranks number 4 on the joint rolling list of the Bordner Basement. Dylan's blunt rolling skills are inherently weak as he broke one of Dan's dutches mistakenly. Additionally, it was discovered that XXXXX rolls better blunts than Dylan without question. We must ask ourselves, why talk about Dylan Silverman? First, he is a very unique individual. He is one of the only kids at Indiana who would lick a chalkboard clean for $20. Additionally, Dylan loves to display public nudity. He enjoys showing his tiny cock to other men as well as revealing his incredibly hairy rear to the general public. Dylan has been involved in lots of mischief here at IU. He was cited for Academic misconduct when he edited a K201 paper illegally. Why would Dylan do such a thing. Honestly, he was not guilty as charged...professors at the University condemned Dylan with a much harsher punishment than he truly deserved. Anyhow, Dylan was ultimately almost forced into failing the class because dropping it would incur a grade of F anyways. In the dorm rooms, Chinch hasn't been much better. He has been cited for drinking in the door rooms under Code H22al. Unauthorized possession, use, or supplying acoholic beverages to others contray to law or univesity policy. Indiana University prohibits public intoxication, use, or possession of alcoholic beverages on university policy. As we can see Dylan has violated many rules at college, but the college experience at Indiana University would not be the same without XXXXX.
Nomination Criteria
editG1 Patent nonsense. Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases.
PATENT NONSENSE is defined as: Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "sdfgdsfkgdshgdkhgdsklhsklgroflmaolololol;;;'dsfgdfg", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed. Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.
Deletion Options
edit| rationale | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Agree with ratioinale to speedy delete. | 7 | 7.9 |
| Disagree with rationale. G1 explicitly excludes "poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes", but deletable by other criteria. | 71 | 79.8 |
| Disagree with rationale, patent nonsense requires text to be "so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever", but this is a case where IAR applies. | 7 | 7.9 |
| Disagree with speedy deletion (should be PRODDED, sent to AFD, or kept.) | 4 | 4.5 |
Survey Comments
edit| Common rationale | Count |
|---|---|
| G10 | 19 |
| G3 | 7 |
| A7 | 3 |
| A1 | 1 |
- Possibly G3 as an obvious hoax. G10 is also a possibility, but this is so poorly written I'm not sure I actually understand what he is trying to say. I may even say go with A7 as an IAR just to sweep it under the rug.
- Speedy delete. All other options are bureaucratic fiddle-faddle.
- Should be speedy deleted under G3, vandalism, assuming there is no better version in page history
- It's an attack page. I would just delete it (changing the rationale from G1 to G10) and move on, no need to notify the tagger.
- Again, quick check to see if this is a notable person, if so change to one-line stub indicating most notable aspect. Otherwise, speediable as an attack/nn-bio
- It's not much of a stretch to call it nonsense, but A7 or G10 would be more applicable.
- While it *is* nonsense, it is also an attack on XXXXX, so that criterion is more relevant.
- While this looks like the sort of article someone would write for the buddy for a laugh (and therefore no actual malice is intended), it nevertheless is an unsourced negative BLP, and should be speedied as such.
Balloonman's analysis
editDeleting this per G1 is not a valid use of G1, while it is poorly written it does not fit the definition of patent nonsense.
That being said, this is clearly a G10 article as it contains unsource BLP violations that are insulting to the target. While arguments could be made for A7 pr G3, G10 is by far and away the best option. The reason is because of the BLP issue. Copyvios and Attack Pages are treated with special care. While another admin might undelete/userfy a speedily deleted article, copyvios and attack pages will rarely be undeleted.