This user wrote Uttar Pradesh, which became a Good Article This user wrote Allahabad, which became a Good Article This user wrote Vivah, which became a Good Article This user contributed in Salman Khan filmography, which became Featured list This user wrote Shilpa Shetty filmography, which became Featured list This user wrote Divya Bharti, which became a Good Article This user wrote Asin filmography, which became Featured list This user wrote Sushmita Sen filmography, which became Featured list This user wrote List of presidents of the Indian National Congress, which became Featured list This user wrote Maine Pyar Kiya, which became a Good Article This user wrote Karisma Kapoor filmography, which became Featured list This user wrote Amrita Rao, which became a Good Article This user wrote List of state presidents of the Indian National Congress, which became Featured list

This editor is a
Veteran Editor II
and is entitled to display this
Bronze Editor Star.


Userboxes
This user is a WikiSloth.
This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.
This user is bold, but not reckless, in updating pages.
This user has created 26 Articles on Wikipedia.
This user has uploaded 53 images (at last check) to Wikimedia Commons.
This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.
Fx
This user supports protection of the environment.


Acknowledgement from peers
The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for all your work. Cheers,
Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 14:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
Thank You for your contributions to Wikipedia!  TOW  talk  18:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar
Hello, Great work on Uttar Pradesh! For your contributions with most number of edits 640 (15.5% of the total edits)! Please make sure it remains a GA! :P Thank you! -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 09:36, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Mentors

Mentors

Notable contributions
Files uploaded
  • You can see most of my photos that I've contributed to Wikipedia in my special Category section :See here
Neat miscellaneous stuff I like
A Wikipedian protester
Wikipedia: the good and the bad
The good
  • For major subjects, Wikipedia treats things in an egalitarian way.
    • For example, when western academia focuses on bigotry, it usually thinks of racism or homosexual rights. Wikipedia points out that other forms of discrimination exist and can be just as bad (Template:Discrimination sidebar).
    • For example, media reporting about the Trayvon Martin case was sensationalist and full of angry people on TV. Only by coming to Wikipedia could I get a true layout of what facts are known to the public.
  • Wikipedia is a great source for notable topics with little internet presence. (e.g., Native American tribes outside of the US; most sources are written in Spanish or Portuguese, and of these most are written in literature not online).
The bad
  • Our mathematical and non-biological scientific articles are terrible. They are written in technobabble that only people already familiar with the subject will understand.
The ugly
Other
  • Wikipedia has errors in it. This is unavoidable: as long as literature exists, errors will exist in it. The key is that Wikipedia's safeguards against errors are as good as anyone's out there (a massive peer-review, if you will, in the form of "anyone can edit").