Template talk:WikiProject Poetry
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
What's with this template??
edit1. Clicking on "Current Activities" takes you, for some reason, to "WikiProject Schools" 2. The Template doesn't assign the article on which its place to any category. I.e. there seems no way of seeing what are all the articles associated with this WikiProject 3. The Template doesn't seem to accomodate any tagging or assessment of priority or state of the articles
In short, this template seems at present to be pretty useless. --Jbmurray 06:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I fixed the Wikiproject schools reference and you can find out what is tagged using the "What links here" link on the toolbox. But, I share your general and more important concern - this doesn't do much to organize the project. If you want to take a crack at a radical edit to bring it in line with some of the other projects, please, go ahead.A Musing 16:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't trust either my design or my technical skills to start editing the template myself. --Jbmurray 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Image
editI changed the image. As much as people love Keats, it seemed a bit lacking in NPOV to have him on the WP:Poetry template. It's now a simple quill so it's more neutral and generic. Hope that's okay. --Midnightdreary 13:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
quill broken
editPerhaps it is my pc making the error, but the quill seems to be gone? Mrathel (talk) 18:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- It seems to be gone... not sure why. I like this replacement though. --Midnightdreary (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the documentation
edit@Redrose64: Thanks for catching me on the categories. I looked up which was the most specific category I could place all of those images into, than apparently forgot to add it to the template once I had found it. I also could've sworn that William Blake was part of Category:William Blake task force articles, but when I looked back at the article to verify this, it's not there. I'm apparently confusing myself with The Canterbury Tales. Anyway, I've taken care of these. Thanks again! –Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)