Template talk:Warwick district

scope

The area title links to the parliamentary constituency. ok good. That area includes all the surrounding villages (Cubbington, Old Milverton, Whitnash etc). These are NOT currently included here, as the wording currently states areas inside Leam and Warwick. Please note this inconsistency, that should be resolved at some point. Widefox (talk) 09:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

OK should I change the title to the Warwick/Leamington Metro Area? AJUK ^Talk!! 10:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

fixed. Widefox (talk) 11:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

OK the point of this template was to create one template that list all the areas that are in that one whole built up area. AJUK ^Talk!! 23:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

The problems (listed above) with the old template are fixed now. Do you have any reference for the urban area, or is it original research? Widefox (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry are you denying its existence? I suppose I could use a map as a reference! AJUK ^Talk!! 09:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

You have a map listing the "Leamington/Warwick metro" area? Widefox (talk) 10:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

No, actually its an urban not metro area I'm referring to. AJUK ^Talk!! 23:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

what's the reference? Widefox (talk) 09:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean its just a built up area, its on the map. AJUK ^Talk!! 15:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Please see WP:OR Widefox (talk) 08:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

What OR? AJUK ^Talk!! 09:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

It actually says in the artical for Leamington "Population growth has led to Leamington forming a small conurbation in excess of 85,000 inhabitants with the neighbouring towns of Warwick and Whitnash and several sizable satellite villages such as Cubbington and Radford Semele." That is what the template was originally to cover. AJUK ^Talk!! 11:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)