This template is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Template:Space exploration lists and timelines was initially a good idea, trying to collect spaceflight-related articles by collecting their lists. However, it has been filled with less relevant topics, just notable for inclusion in that template for happening to being spaceflight-related lists (such as List of Mir spacewalks, notable indeed but I think there are many other articles deserving a look before going to that one). Therefore, I think we need a general spaceflight template. Templates to further related articles may be found in the subarticles of this one. Man on the Mars (talk) 06:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
This template is a good idea, but it probably makes sense to pro-actively address the question implied above, i.e. "What are the criteria for inclusion of a topic in this template?" Is it, for example, somehow connected to the "spaceflight-importance" value in the corresponding {{WPSpace}} template? (sdsds - talk) 23:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply