Template talk:Non-admin closure
Latest comment: 1 year ago by HouseBlaster in topic Discussion on substituting this template
Subst?
editHey! Any idea why this template needs substitution? It doesn't fill in any details such as signatures. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 02:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 24 June 2021
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "closes a deletion discussion" in the documentation to "closes a discussion". I have seen this template used on requests for comment and other talk page discussions. The linked essay WP:NAC is not only about deletion discussions either. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC) Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Sangdeboeuf: The template's documentation isn't protected, just so you know. Few templates' docs, if any, are. That said,
Partly done. I worded it a bit differently so as not to imply that you should use the template with non-XfD closes, as that would be making policy by template documentation. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 06:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Discussion on substituting this template
edit
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure § Should Template:nac (and variations) be substituted?. HouseBlastertalk 03:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)