Template talk:Crossrail 2

Revisions

This template is now CORRECT. Please Please don't revert the errors back into it calling them "dross".  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

If you don't want the trains per hour listed then please explain why they are not needed and remove them alone, the reversion deleted other corrections. As per how we do things here.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Again, please don't revert the corrections without reason.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

It seems that User:Useddenim didn't like the use of ↓ to denote a ditto. Replaced with repeated values  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Useddenim

Please don't introduce erros into the Crossrail 2 map (Template:Crossrail). Thanks. If you want to remove "dross" please EXPLAIN why it is on the talk page for the template, as per the rules .  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

I believe the correct spelling is ‘erroRs’ (unless you meant ‘arrows’); but be specific about what you meant. A simple diff will show what was changed, and—as noted in the edit summary—most of what you added properly belongs in article text. And when you finally figure out how to use BSicons correctly, then maybe you can lecture me about ‘the rules’. Useddenim (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Please talk first and revert later. I've been using BSicons correctly for many years, it seems to me that you're the one in error here! Please don't take out the corrected line order for the top stations and the corrections to the station order on the optional sections. There's actually a whole column in the BSicons template for timings, why are you removing the data?  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Crossrail 2
2015 Consultation Route "Citizen Space - Crossrail 2 - October 2015". Retrieved 2015-11-22.
West Anglia Main Line Unless the line extends a significant distance beyond the station, exENDEa is incorrect. tph Trains Per Hour This properly belongs in the text, not a diagram. Also, this is not yet finalized: see WP:NOTCRYSTAL. 10-12 Broxbourne The arrows are just plain confusing. ↓ Cheshunt Overground via Seven Sisters Why hide the proper name of the link? (Lea Valley Lines) ↓ Waltham Cross M25 motorway Greater London limit ↓ Enfield Lock ↓ Brimsdown ↓ Ponders End ↓ Angel Road (Meridian Water) 10-12 Northumberland Park 15 Tottenham Hale West Anglia Main Line Italics are for off-line features. Oakleigh Road depot DST is a depot; HST is a minor station. 10-15 New Southgate 15 Alexandra Palace and ↓ Turnpike Lane or ↓ Wood Green 15 Seven Sisters 30 Dalston Your revision named it ‘Easten’. future Eastern Branch 0 Hackney Central The icon should be extINT, not etKBSTxe. 30 Angel ↓ Euston St. Pancras ↓ Tottenham Court Road ↓ Victoria ↓ King's Road Chelsea River Thames ↓ Clapham Junction ↓ Balham or ↓ Tooting Broadway Wier Road depot Missing PORTALf tunnel portal. South Western Main Line 30 Wimbledon stations below also serve Waterloo unless marked ♦ This note belongs in the article text, if it is even relevant in the first place. 20 Raynes Park 8-10 Motspur Park Corner icon is in the wrong row (sloppy, sloppy). 4 Malden Manor ♦ ↓ Tolworth ♦ ↓ Chessington North ♦ 4 Chessington South ♦ 4-6 Worcester Park ↓ Stoneleigh ♦ ↓ Ewell West ♦ 4-6 Epsom 10-12 New Malden 4 Berrylands ♦ ↓ Surbiton ↓ Thames Ditton ♦ 4 Hampton Court ♦ 6-8 Norbiton ↓ Kingston ↓ Hampton Wick 6-8 Teddington 4 Fulwell ↓ Hampton ↓ Kempton Park ↓ Sunbury ↓ Upper Halliford 4 Shepperton

Besides the items highlighted in your version of the diagram, to the right, there are the other issues that I have corrected, such as adding {{rws}} and {{rail-interchange}} templates to increase legibility and simplify editing. As far as the track geometry issue (is the West Anglia Main Line to the left or the right of Crosssrail 2?); well, based on the poor quality of your other edits, I decided to revert that to the previous configuration, as well. Useddenim (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

I personally prefer the old version by Useddenim, however I think that Briantist's side of the WAML is probably correct (the consultation documents weren't clear about it). But there are a few minor changes needed - most stations, especially south London, need to be HSTs not BHF; the WAML probably should be by CONTr so it doesn't look like it's pointing at the end of the ECML branch, also New Southgate needs the HUB stuff as it will be a single station, and thus also needs ECML arrows. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Briantist: Starting a discussion one place (my talk page) but continuing it elsewhere is (at best) disingenuous, and in poor form. And in neither place did you actually explain what the alleged errors were. Useddenim (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)