This template is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I guess there are two things that most immediately strike the eye here. The first is the absence of any mention of the Asgard archaea, which are obviously of extreme interest for their relationship to the Eukaryota. The second is the exceptional number of redlinks. These are deprecated in a navigation box, for the obvious reason that they cannot be navigated to. While the highest level groupings like superphyla may perhaps be acceptable, the redlinked classes and orders are not, as they make the navbox extremely large (basically a full screen on many devices) and nearly entirely unusable. These changes are important, and the current structure is both clearly unsuitable and against policy, so I shall make the basic changes immediately. As for more detailed updates to nomenclature, it would be desirable to check and correct the group names (Halobacteria is obviously Haloarchaea, for instance), but those changes can be made as and when. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
