A target benefit plan is a type of pension plan that is similar to a defined contribution plan in that it involves fixed contributions, or a fixed range of contributions, which are set independently of a plan's funded position. Benefits are based on affordability projections. Plan members share plan risk through adjustments to their benefits.

A key element of the target benefit model is the existence of pre-determined guidelines linking benefits to funds available in the plan. Benefits and contributions are linked in a way that does not exist with traditional defined benefit or defined contribution plans.[1]

Description

edit

Target benefit plans are similar to defined benefit plans in that the annual contribution is determined by a formula to calculate the amount needed each year to accumulate (at an assumed interest rate) a fund sufficient to pay a projected retirement benefit, the target benefit, to each participant upon reaching retirement. It is similar to a defined contribution plan in that the plan does not guarantee any benefit will be paid. The plan's only obligation is to pay whatever benefit can be provided by the amount in the contributor's account.[2] The actual earnings on the individual accounts may differ from the estimated earnings used in the assumptions and the investment performance of that account through the years.[3]

Advantages

edit

For pension plan sponsors, target benefits plan provide more flexibility than traditional defined benefit or defined contribution plans. Defined benefit plans provide a high degree of benefit certainty for members, but for plan sponsors contribution rates are more uncertain and funding costs can be high. Defined benefit plans can also contribute to intergeneration inequality, as retired members continue to receive benefits, whether or not those benefits were adequately pre-funded. The reverse is true for defined contribution plans where the contribution certainty comes at the cost of complete benefit uncertainty.[1]

Canada

edit

The target benefit model is growing in Canada. Only the province of New Brunswick has the full legislative structure required to operate target benefit plans, which in that province are called shared-risk pension plans. Several other provinces including Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan, British Columbia and Alberta have introduced legislation allowing for target benefit plans, but are waiting for the establishment of a regulatory regime that would outline the specific rules governing this type of pension plan.[4]

In 2016, Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau introduced Bill C-27, a new piece of federal legislation that enables Crown corporations and federal private-sector employers to establish target-benefit plans. Major Canadian unions expressed their opposition to the legislation on the grounds that it would undermine the worker security of defined-benefit plans, contrary to the government's election commitments to strengthen retirement security.[5] The bill later became controversial because it became known that Morneau still had substantial holdings in Morneau Shapell, which he had led in his prior career.[6] While leading Morneau Shapell, Morneau had advocated for such plans, and the firm had worked with the government of New Brunswick to establish target-benefit plans and stood to gain from similar consulting work under the legislation.[6]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Target Benefit Plans: The Future of Sustainable Retirement Programs (Aon Hewitt, 2012). Retrieved on October 9, 2012
  2. ^ Webber, David H. (2019). "Reforming Pensions While Retaining Shareholder Voice". Boston University Law Review. 99: 1017. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  3. ^ "Retirement Plan Primer". The Motley Fool. February 20, 2002. Retrieved October 10, 2013.
  4. ^ Unpacking the Target Benefit Plan: Finding the Right Benefit/Funding Balance (Aon Hewitt, 2012). Retrieved on October 9, 2013.
  5. ^ Canadian Labour Congress (17 November 2016). "Canada's unions call anti-pension bill C-27 a betrayal". Marketwired. Retrieved 29 October 2017.
  6. ^ a b Wingrove, Josh (20 October 2017). "Pressure Mounts on Morneau to Drop Canadian Pension Proposal". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 29 October 2017.