Talk:Zig and Zag (Australian performers)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Theme song
editAnyone remember how the song ends?
I think it was something like
pleasing you's the job I'm given pleasing you makes life worth living
- but that's as far as I can get ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.132.28.166 (talk • contribs) .
It went like this:
pleasing you's the job I'm given
pleasing you makes life worth living
When we're wrong we'll be forgiven
As we roll along
Together we belong
To be worked into the article at some stage
editDirect from the House of Zig Suzanne Carbone and Lawrence Money The Age, November 15, 2006
WHATEVER happened to Zig, the disgraced half of the famous Melbourne clowns? Doug McKenzie, the better half, turned up his curly toes two years ago but Diary has not heard a word about Zig, Jack Perry, until now, although we're none the wiser if he's still with us. Diary had a call from South Melbourne: the Salvos store in Clarendon Street has been selling his stuff. Kitchen chairs, a bedroom dresser with mirror, two bedside cabinets, all optimistically marked: "heritage" and "Once belonged to Zig the Clown".
The lady at the counter said she had never heard of Zig and Zag but the "men who collected it said that was where it came from".
You remember the tragic saga: after four decades of frolicking with the kids, starring in Moomba and on ankle-biter television, Zig and Zag were finally made Moomba monarchs in 1999 but the reign was over before it began. Suddenly it was revealed that, years before, Zig had pleaded guilty to child molestation and he (and, hence, hapless Zag) was dethroned. Zig and Zag never spoke to each other again. If still alive, Zig would be 89 now.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Zig and Zag (Australian performers). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110817215801/http://hinch.net/hinch-says-2011/May/13-05-11.html to http://hinch.net/hinch-says-2011/May/13-05-11.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110312055204/http://www.cv.vic.gov.au/stories/tv50-anniversary-of-television-in-australia/7168/zig-and-zag-hats/ to http://www.cv.vic.gov.au/stories/tv50-anniversary-of-television-in-australia/7168/zig-and-zag-hats
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.coasit.com.au/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll?BU=&TN=IHSnew&RF=Web%3EIHSfull&MR=&AC=QBE_QUERY&CS=2&QY=Number%3D+P-02060
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zig and Zag (Australian performers). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720154510/http://screensound.gov.au/docs/collectionguide_oralhistory_radio.pdf to http://screensound.gov.au/docs/collectionguide_oralhistory_radio.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Problems with categories
editThe duo don't have a birth year or a death year. The individuals were born in different years and died in different years. I will remove these categories.Ulterior aurum (talk) 12:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
June 2024 edits
editI have reverted a series of three edits here by User:122.106.14.220, which effectively deleted all usage of the TV Week (May 1958), reference without any explanation beyond correct section. This is an important contemporaneous source for background on the activities of the clown duo and the individual members, hence I have returned it.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)06:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @122.106.14.220: Once again this user has removed content and the above reference (see here). I dispute the necessity of its removal. I ask the user to explain their edits, here, before removing it again.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Upon further examination, it seems that a ref tab was mis-named, which has now been fixed. I'm working on the article to bring it closer to the form the above user seemed to prefer. shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)