reference to Stus as being represented by Medvedchuk in this context seems wrong

edit

While it is true that Medvedchuk pro forma "defended" Stus too, should it be Litvin to whom the reference is made in this sentence from the article: "The later influential (in Ukrainian politics) Viktor Medvedchuk defended Stus during this trial." 62.72.67.179 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply