Talk:You Never Give Me Your Money/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ritchie333 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 14:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


Hi. I will try to start this review in the next couple of days and complete it soon after. Thanks. Moisejp (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

No disambig links or problems with external links. Moisejp (talk) 05:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    I checked the sources that I had access to, and found no copyright vios. The prose is concise and clear with no errors.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    All OK.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    All sources use pass reliability standards.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Gives a good overview of the song, including sections about its background, recording, personnel, and cover versions.
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    The article is neutral and has no biases.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    No edit wars. Stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    No images are provide, thus no rationales needed.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments:

  1. "Tenacious D have regularly included this song in their live performances as a "Beatles Medley" along with "The End" from Abbey Road." But the source given doesn't say that they perform the song "regularly". Maybe add additional references to be able to say they "have performed the song multiple times"? Or combine it with the next sentence, and say "Tenacious D and Paloma Faith have each performed this song live in concert."
There are many sources (such as this) that document Tenacious D playing the song, including changing the line "Monday morning, turning back" to, well, something else and playing the mid-section instrumental break badly (probably deliberately), but none of them are reliable sources, so it's been difficult to prove the "regularly" bit. I've added a few other sources, and just changed it to say they've performed it live. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  1. Should the author of the "Songs of the Beatles" review be Ron Wynn? Moisejp (talk) 03:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Great, it all looks good. Congratulations, this is now a GA! Moisejp (talk) 04:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply