Talk:Woodford Academy

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Woodford Academy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Australian residential architectural styles#Georgian|Victorian Georgian]] Anchor Australian residential architectural styles#Georgian links to a specific web page: Georgian architecture. The anchor (#Georgian) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Copy comment posted to User talk:Rangasyd page

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Rangasyd: Thank you for adding Woodford Academy to this site. Unfortunately many of the references and citations in the source material used are either secondary or hearsay. The WA Management committee has spent several years creating an updated version of the Academy history which has been accepted by the Blue Mountains Cit (sic.) Council and Heritage NSW as the most current and accurate history of the building - it is listed here :

Data Source: Local Government
Record Owner: Blue Mountains City Council
Heritage Item ID: 1170185
url: https://www.hms.heritage.nsw.gov.au/App/Item/ViewItem?itemId=1170185

"The following supplementary historical material was provided by the local Branch of the National Trust of Australia (NSW) as part of the 2017 Heritage Review (ref NTA correspondence dd 30th January 2017)". We would attempt to correct the many errors in the current listing ourselves but we are not familiar with the medium or the editing process. The updated Heritage listing adresses all the issues including the incorrect attribution of the site as a hospital by Dr. Mark Henry Long (He was a chemist and his wife ran the building as a Guesthouse while he was bankrupt). Could you replace the incorrect information harvested from the old version of Heritage NSW with the current listing? Thank you. Woodford Acadamey Management Committee (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Rangasyd (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Woodford Acadamey (sic.) Management Committee, I would like to suggest two points:

You work out how to edit Wikipedia. Here is a good place to start.
You make the edits directly to Woodford Academy, citing the references that you claim to have.

I am watching Woodford Academy for the next six months and will be able to review your edits and provide you with constructive feedback on your edits. Good luck. Cheers. Rangasyd (talk) 10:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your prompt response and suggestion that we 'work out how to edit Wikipedia'.

As we stated we are not skilled at editing Wiki entries and as as one of our members has already attempted but been rebuffed in their attempt to correct the errors we do not have the skills to take on this task. We are extremely skilled in the history and research of this institution though and our 'claim' is backed up by the fully cited listing on the NSW Heritage Review. It is frustrating to see errors and secondary source attributions being cited as facts. It negates any claims that this medium has to accuracy.

As you took it upon yourself to copy and paste the earlier incorrect Heritage listing could you either delete the Woodford Acdemy listing or copy and paste the more current one.

Thank you

Woodford ACADEMY Management Committee Woodford Acadamey Management Committee (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic