Talk:Wolstenholme's theorem
Latest comment: 5 years ago by G1729 in topic Converse of Babbage's Theorem
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Converse of Babbage's Theorem
editBabbage in the 1819 paper cited for proof of his theorem appeared to state that like Wilson's theorem, his theorem was an "if and only if" statement with respect to primality (please correct me if I have the above wrong) whereas the converse of Wolstenholme's theorem is unproven according to the section of this article titled "Converse of Wolstenholme's theorem". Should we clearly mention the iff nature of Babbage's theorem (assuming the above is correct)? G1729 (talk) 02:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wolstenholme's theorem page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wolstenholme's theorem" page.
