Talk:Winchmore Hill F.C.
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from https://www.winchmorehillfc.co.uk/. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2020080110003291. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... I am the owner of the copyright at www.winchmorehillfc.co.uk and I have submitted the necessary email to the Wiki permissions inbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balami (talk • contribs) 11:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Notability and third party sources
edit@Balami:, I've noticed that the article is based only on sources affiliated with the subject. Since amateur clubs are not automatically notable, it is important to demonstrate with independent sources that the club is notable ( see WP:INDEPENDENT for more information). Per WP:FOOTYN an English amateur club is notable if it can be shown to have played in 1) either the FA Amateur Cup, FA Cup, FA Trophy or FA Vase or 2) step 6 of the National League System. Is it possible to demonstrate one of these criteria though sources not affiliated with the club? If this is not the case, it is best to start a deletion discussion. Best Modussiccandi (talk) 11:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)