Talk:William Betham (1779–1853)

Latest comment: 9 years ago by CaroleHenson in topic Article titles

Article titles

edit

The father and son articles: William I Betham (1749–1839) and William II Betham (1779–1853) were moved to William Betham (1749–1839) and William Betham (1779–1853) because:

  • The correct format would have been William Betham I and William Betham II or Sr./Jr.
  • In this case, William born in 1749 was the son of William (born 1698), who was the son of Edward.
  • Since it's not clear, though, if they all had the same middle names, I removed the I and II and left the years in the article title (rather than making them William Betham II and William Betham III).--CaroleHenson (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply