Talk:Widerøe Flight 710

Widerøe Flight 710 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 12, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 6, 2022.

Aviation: Accidents

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Widerøe Flight 710/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 17:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead

Lead looks very well. No issues here.

Flight

"He had a total flight time of 6,458, of which 85 hours was" --> "He had a total flight time of 6,458 hours, of which 85 were"
"The aircraft had during the morning of 6 May been used" Why not put "been used" before "during the morning"?
"which is received permission to" which is? You can remove "permission to" to avoid breaking the sentence.
"The first first point on the checklist"...
"Three second later" Seconds

Cause

Nothing here

Salvage

Good

Aftermath

Nothing here

Okay. Everything seems very good. Awaiting to pass. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 00:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

- I've gone through and made the changes you listed. Lukeno94 (talk) 13:30, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
  - Passed :) — ΛΧΣ²¹ 13:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aftermath

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The final sentence is "The roll-out ... is scheduled for completion in 2013." Can this be updated? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic