Talk:Wickham Laboratories Ltd

Learn more about this page

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Possible POV issues

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I believe there may be some serious WP:POV issues in the article.

Use of "raided" and "removed" based on book written by the subject

The use of "raided" to describe the act of breaking into the laboratory, and especially "removed" to describe the act of stealing the mice violate WP:WEASEL and should be neutrally reworded. These weasel words are both from the autobiography of the same guy who broke into the lab and stole the mice! This grossly fails standards for neutrality, reliable sources, and about a dozen other policies, and serve no purpose other than to minimize the author's perceived offense.

More amazingly, the only other reference in the article mentioning the break-in that wasn't written by the subject is the The Portsmouth Today reference, previously added by User:SlimVirgin, which uses the term "terror tactics" to describe the break-in!

I've added a neutral reference from The Independent, and (per it) I'm changing it to "burglary" and "burglarized". These are official legal terms and are supported by the reference. In case you were interested, in his other book, Mann himself states on page 31 that he and his associates "had gone there tooled up to break-in (headlights, crowbar, screwdrivers, cutters, saw and so on)".

Cursing at rabbits

The Times Online citation here states "The filming, compiled over a period of eight months, included a sequence in which a member of staff made a number of attempts to inject a rabbit. She is recorded calling the animal “a little shit” and “a disgrace”.

a)This is the only example cited of the aforementioned cursing, and the wording ("included a sequence...") makes it appear that this was the only such incident captured. Therefore, it needs to be in the singular.

b)Furthermore, the Times Online article points out the circumstance, i.e- the lab worker is trying to inject the rabbit and is struggling with it and cursing at it out of frustration. Allegations aside, at the VERY minimum this sentence needs to include the explanation of the circumstances that is in the original reference, to avoid POV by deliberate omission.

Quotations

The removal of the quotation marks from the directly quoted threat that Bishop's "troubles had just begun". This is both directly cited from the Portsmouth Today reference previously added by User:SlimVirgin and largely abbreviated for some reason. Both have a serious POV context. Thus, I've restored the full and unabridged quote with the appropriate inline citation. I've even added one from the judge in the case in order to flesh it out better. Again, these are all 100% directly quoted from the references.

Thanks! Bullzeye ^contribs 07:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic