| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Westholme House article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Westholme House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 23, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Westholme House appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Westholme House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SilkTork (talk · contribs) 07:56, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements as I'm reading the article rather than list them here; if there is a lot of copy-editing to be done I may suggest getting a copy-editor (on the basis that a fresh set of eyes is helpful). Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria. SilkTork ✔Tea time
Tick box
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments on GA criteria
edit- Pass
- Prose clear and readable. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Image clear and appropriate. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Appropriate reference section. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Meets MoS. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Query
- Fail
General comments
edit- Pass. This is an attractive and useful encyclopaedic guide to Westholme House in Sleaford. Clearly written, using a range of sources, and laid out neatly and helpfully following Wikipedia guidelines. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I am uncertain about inclusion of a link to the YouTube video. See WP:YOUTUBE. I tagged it when reading through, then forgot to check it. I've looked at it, and it is uncertain if the uploader had permission. The copyright status of the film is also unclear. If the film is not copyrighted and/or the uploader had permission to upload it to YouTube, then linking to it would be OK. It's up to you if you want to do the research into that. In the meantime I have removed the link from the article. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)