Talk:Warren Schrader/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Pickersgill-Cunliffe in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 16:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'll take this one. Feel free to query any of my comments or correct me!

Prelim

edit
  • No duplicated links
  • Images look good
  • References look good
  • Infobox cited where necessary

Lead

edit
  • I doubt there's a particular link available for the Channel Front, but linking it partially to the English Channel might be helpful to some

Early life

edit
  • Link Wellington - would also suggest linking draper and clerk

Second World War

edit
  • Is his joining the RNZAF in the same month as his twentieth birthday coincidental or was this the first opportunity he would have had to join up?
  • In WWII, New Zealanders could join up at 18 but serve overseas they had to be 20. I don't have a source that explicitly states this as the motivation for Schrader though. Zawed (talk) 10:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Can you expand on why training continued in Canada and perhaps what this specifically was?
  • What exactly does "flying cover for the amphibious attack" mean in this instance? It sounds to me like he just flew above the landings and watched, which I don't expect was the case!
  • Link Sicily
  • Again, could you expand on what he was actually doing to "provide cover for Operation Husky"?
  • "the squadron had upgraded to Mk. IX Spitfires" - what does this mean for Schrader? Faster, more manoeuvrable, etc?
  • "conversion course on the Hawker Tempest" > "conversion course for the Hawker Tempest"
  • "In March, and now a flight lieutenant" - is the date of promotion known? And for that matter what happened to flying officer?!
  • Link flight lieutenant
  • "to join No. 486 (NZ) Squadron" - I assume he's flying Tempests here but that could be clarified
  • "Schrader shot down a series of enemy aircraft " - is this series of victories the 190s on 10, 15, 16, and 21 April? If so the majority of this "quick succession" is described in a different paragraph, and when reading it the first time I assumed the actions in the second paragraph of Europe were a different series of events to the "quick succession" of the first paragraph.
  • Link Hopsten
  • "He destroyed two more Fw 190s on 15 April, in one of the squadron's most successful engagements for several enemy aircraft were shot down that day during a single patrol." > "He destroyed two more Fw 190s on 15 April in one of the squadron's most successful engagements, with several enemy aircraft being shot down in a single patrol."
  • "His command of No. 486 Squadron was made permanent the same day." - is this when he is promoted to squadron leader?
  • It is not clear when exactly he was promoted; either when taking over command in an acting capacity, or when it was made permanent presumably. I have added mention of "Now a squadron leader". Zawed (talk) 09:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Two more Bf 109s were destroyed on 29 April over the Lauenburg bridgehead with another damaged" - are these his victories or those of his squadron? Could be made clearer despite the following sentence
  • Link sortie
  • Link Luneberg
  • "he destroyed three aircraft on the ground" - out of pure interest, did one of these count as the "first enemy aircraft destroyed by a British fighter-jet" or did that have to be airborne?
  • Number format; you have "11 enemy aircraft" but "two more destroyed", etc
  • Might it be noted that he "flew only six operational flights in the jets", per the Otago Daily Times article?
  • Link undercarriage
  • Done.
  • "Promoted to wing commander, Schrader was given command" - could you provide a more specific date?
  • "given command of a wing" - you name his squadron commands so it would make sense if possible to name this wing too

Later life

edit
  • The Air New Zealand article states that the NAC-ANZ merger occurred in 1978, two years after Schrader's retirement, thus the merger information doesn't seem relevant to him
  • "he retired from the NAC"

That's all I have for now, please ping me and comment as necessary. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Pickersgill-Cunliffe, thank you for the thorough review. I have made a number of edits here and responded above. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:53, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Having made a few minor tweaks to links and sentencing that I hope you'll have no issue with, I am happy to pass this article. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply