Talk:Walton-on-the-Hill

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walton-on-the-Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000311/http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm to http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walton-on-the-Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025014840/http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsite/sccwspublications.nsf/591f7dda55aad72a80256c670041a50d/1c602ea59c869c9180256e600054b26c/$FILE/Town%20populations.pdf to http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsite/sccwspublications.nsf/591f7dda55aad72a80256c670041a50d/1c602ea59c869c9180256e600054b26c/$FILE/Town%20populations.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 30 September 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 23:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

---

Walton-on-the-Hill → Walton-on-the-Hill, Surrey – No clear primary topic, the Surrey one has 310 views but the Staffordshire one has 44 and the Liverpool one has 1,616. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 22:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

So you'll be making a disambig page there? Why not make it first? Dicklyon (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Contesting. Walton, Liverpool apparently hasn't been called "Walton on the Hill" since 1922, so unlikely that people are looking for it by this name. Of the 666 page views last month for Walton-on-the-Hill, there were 12 clickthroughs to Walton, Liverpool. SilverLocust 💬 00:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Dicklyon and SilverLocust: Yes it should be a DAB page or redirect back to Walton. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose for the reason I contested the technical request at WP:RM/TR. (Walton, Liverpool apparently hasn't been called "Walton on the Hill" since 1922, so unlikely that people are looking for it by this name. Of the 666 page views last month for Walton-on-the-Hill, there were 12 clickthroughs to Walton, Liverpool.) SilverLocust 💬 18:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose per SilverLocust Kowal2701 (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
• Support per nom. The Staffordshire village is actually larger. No indication that the Surrey village is primary topic per long-term significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
• Support per nom and Necrothesp. I disagree with SilverLocust's statement because just because something is no longer referred a name/phrase as a WP:COMMONNAME doesn't mean it isn't still referred to by the old name in some contexts, especially historical. Steel1943 (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.